PDA

View Full Version : Can I change back to the old way to mark new posts?



VeloZer0
01-05-2010, 07:04 PM
After giving the new way to mark new unread posts, I can certianly say that I like the old way much better, for a veriety of reasons I won't get in to. I was wondering if it is possible to allow users to specify which way they would like new posts marked? Although I would admit I have no idea how much work that would be.

Also, since I am posting on the subject, and fyi that often a sub forum will show it has unread posts in it, but once I visit the forum there are no new posts.

(I am referring to how once you visited the forum all threads would be marked read, and when you returned only new posts since you last visited would be marked. Now a thread is only marked as read if you actually go into it.)

Rantz
01-05-2010, 07:45 PM
I'm afraid it's all or nothing. I doubt it's even possible to make a hack that allows this to be a user choice. :(

I much prefer the new way, I have to say, but it might be worth seeing what the rest of the forum thinks as a follow-up.

Necronopticous
01-05-2010, 10:51 PM
The new way is nothing but an annoyance.

Baloki
01-05-2010, 11:37 PM
I am all for beating BoB up and re-taking our old read posts method.

VeloZer0
01-05-2010, 11:40 PM
Oh god, look what I've started.

Baloki
01-05-2010, 11:42 PM
I've been demanding something be done about BoB for years, don't you be trying to take the credit!

Mirage
01-05-2010, 11:42 PM
I kinda prefer the old way myself, but I can live with this.

Rantz
01-05-2010, 11:58 PM
I made a thread about it in GC, you can go vote there if you want!

rubah
01-06-2010, 12:37 AM
I can't even tell a difference

Vyk
01-07-2010, 03:03 AM
I'm with rubah, it was always pretty random to me how it'd eventually give up on trying to get me to read certain threads. But I've never experienced it marking the whole forum as read just by visiting and leaving

Raistlin
01-07-2010, 04:31 AM
Even if we don't change back, can we still beat up BoB?

Rantz
01-07-2010, 10:31 AM
I don't see why not.