PDA

View Full Version : What's the correct term for this type of relationship?



MJN SEIFER
08-05-2011, 07:59 PM
This is mostly for fiction, but technically speaking this exists in real life as well (it's just harder to notice, unless you're really observant). What is the correct term when you got two people, who aren't a couple, but are friends who are in love with each other, but don't know the other one is?

AngelWings8
08-05-2011, 08:30 PM
Unrequited love? Unrequited love - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrequited_love)

demondude
08-05-2011, 08:30 PM
Me and NCG.

Rebellious Eagle
08-06-2011, 01:38 AM
Unrequited love? Unrequited love - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrequited_love)

But in this case the love is reciprocated, just that neither of the friends know.

AngelWings8
08-06-2011, 01:43 AM
Unfulfilled love?

blackmage_nuke
08-06-2011, 03:14 AM
Two people who are bad at picking up signals?

I'd call it faulty sattelite love

Martyr
08-06-2011, 03:31 AM
Awkwardness

sharkythesharkdogg
08-06-2011, 12:56 PM
All day suckers.

Pike
08-06-2011, 04:05 PM
"Missing out"

The Captain
08-07-2011, 06:30 PM
The ending for almost every sitcom, romantic comedy and Disney movie.

Take care all.

Araciel
08-07-2011, 06:40 PM
'idiots'

Mercen-X
08-10-2011, 08:47 PM
So lame. Sorry to ruin you fantasy, but if your goal is shorten the description of their relationship to one-to-three words, nope, there is no proper terminology. There just BFFs. Until one of them admits their feelings for the other, no matter how they feel toward each other, they can't be called anything else... unless they're siblings.

If you want, you can make up a word and submit it to be added to the dictionary with the definition you supplied in your post.

Rianoa
08-10-2011, 10:58 PM
"Fucked"

BG-57
08-11-2011, 12:10 AM
Yeah, you have to a coin a phrase here. I've been poking around TVTropes, which loves this kind of thing and the best entry I can find is 'oblivious to love'.

I suggest you call it 'mutually oblivious'.

CimminyCricket
08-11-2011, 03:54 AM
I suggest you call it 'mutually oblivious'.

This.