PDA

View Full Version : Hi, my sig was not allowed *rants*



Peegee
12-11-2003, 02:07 AM
Change your screen settings to 800x600. Now look at edczxcvbnm's and "el mariachi"'s sigs. There are others as well. They all stretch the tables, albeit not as much as mine did, but still they did.

Explain kthx *explodes into a puff of smoke *poof* *

Linus
12-11-2003, 02:13 AM
Smoking is bad.

Shoyku
12-11-2003, 02:25 AM
You stinkin' rat.

Linus
12-11-2003, 02:33 AM
I noe rite.

Peegee
12-11-2003, 03:36 AM
*kicks you all with a shovel*

Shlup
12-11-2003, 03:51 AM
Report 'em and I'll remove 'em, ho. Yours was only removed 'cause someone complained about it. :p

eestlinc
12-11-2003, 04:18 AM
pg's signature was awesome though.

:cry:

Shlup
12-11-2003, 04:19 AM
It wasn't allowed, so I hear, because it was too long. He could just make it shorter. :p

Red Wizard
12-11-2003, 04:22 AM
MS Paint is quite good at cropping images. Bleys would know.

Peegee
12-11-2003, 05:47 AM
It's HARD to crop. I had to move the title within the picture, and still it was too big. omg it's going to be impossible.

Anyway I'm so reporting ppl. They will die

edczxcvbnm
12-11-2003, 05:52 AM
Hey....PG....

<font style="font-size: 250pt">HA HA</font>

Dr Unne
12-11-2003, 05:56 AM
Disallow sig pics altogether.

edczxcvbnm
12-11-2003, 05:57 AM
Originally posted by Dr Unne
Disallow sig pics altogether.

But I like looking at sigs and pictures. It helps me to escape this drab background.

Strider
12-11-2003, 05:59 AM
My signature stretches tables?

edczxcvbnm
12-11-2003, 06:00 AM
Originally posted by El Mariachi
My signature stretches tables?

Yes it does but not to the point were one would have to scroll to read what you have said. It streaches it only slightly.

Rainecloud
12-11-2003, 07:51 AM
It only stretches the tables of people using really low resolutions, I think.


Disallow sig pics altogether.

I'll second that.

Peegee
12-11-2003, 08:29 AM
IT BREAKS THE RULES AND IF I CAN'T USE MY SIG NEITHER SHOULD DIE *GRRR RAWR SNARL*

bennator
12-11-2003, 01:56 PM
You guys have sigs? No way!

(turning sigs off is awesome)

Meow
12-11-2003, 05:42 PM
Heh, it got removed again. Poor PG.

My friend Kevin decided i have SARS instead of Mono. Oh well.

Flying Mullet
12-11-2003, 05:44 PM
Tell people to view this site with a minimum resolution of 768 X 1024.

Spatvark
12-11-2003, 05:52 PM
maybe even 1024 x 768? And nah, I don't think we'll be doing that any time soon =P

edczxcvbnm
12-11-2003, 06:02 PM
I would never view the site at that resolution. I sit farther away from my monitor than most people so the lettering isn't all that big even on 800x600. At school where I sit a normal distance from the screen the lettering looks the same as it does at home yet the resolution is 1024x768. I just sit too far back from the screen and that isn't going to change. Its a comfort thing ;)

Peegee
12-11-2003, 06:39 PM
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS IS 565X250 omfg! Ed's breaks that by 3 pixels. All he has to do is crop it by 3 px and that'll be that.

grr!!! :haet:

Shlup
12-11-2003, 08:50 PM
You are such a snot. *bans Pee Gee*

edczxcvbnm
12-11-2003, 10:39 PM
Originally posted by Pureghetto
MAXIMUM DIMENSIONS IS 565X250 omfg! Ed's breaks that by 3 pixels. All he has to do is crop it by 3 px and that'll be that.

grr!!! :haet:

Make me you [handsome man] :D

Flying Mullet
12-11-2003, 10:44 PM
Originally posted by edczxcvbnm
Make me you [handsome man] :D
My ed you're so eloquent.

edczxcvbnm
12-11-2003, 10:44 PM
Originally posted by Flying Mullet
My ed you're so eloquent.

Thank you ;)

Strider
12-12-2003, 02:43 AM
Hmm. So mine really did get removed. Sonovabitch.

No biggie, though, I can shrink it so all the type A's of the world can be satisfied. ;)

edczxcvbnm
12-12-2003, 05:15 AM
Aww come on...It didn't streach the tables :D

Shlup
12-12-2003, 05:35 AM
Originally posted by edczxcvbnm
Aww come on...It didn't streach the tables :D I'm not sure if I could bring myself to ban you, but I have no qualms about killing you.

Strider
12-12-2003, 05:41 AM
You're not gonna kill me, too, if I start complaining, right?

edczxcvbnm
12-12-2003, 05:46 AM
Originally posted by ShlupQuack
I'm not sure if I could bring myself to ban you, but I have no qualms about killing you.

I'm just having fun. I am not even being serious. Lighten up :riiight:

Killing is teh funz

Peegee
12-12-2003, 04:22 PM
Yay I rule ^_^

edczxcvbnm
12-12-2003, 07:02 PM
Originally posted by Pureghetto
Yay I rule ^_^

Yes you do but I still go out of shrinking my signature down ^___^

I liked it better before with all the black space. That looked like it was teh coolies!

Strider
12-12-2003, 07:34 PM
THERE, PG, ARE YOU FLIPPIN' HAPPY NOW?

Loony BoB
12-12-2003, 10:33 PM
<<i></i>img src="http://www.geocities.com/ghettoprops/sars.txt" alt="omfg lol"/>

This sig with a 565 pixel wide image stretched the tables.

<<i></i>/td><<i></i>/tr><<i></i>/table><<i></i>img src="http://falcon.tp.devry.edu/~smcc6694/fury.jpg"><<i></i>table>

This sig with a 568 pixel wide image did not.

Must be something to do with the HTML. Either way, Peeg's sig stretched the tables and edc's didn't, so yeah. Maybe someone should put this into Peeg's sig box:

<<i></i>/td><<i></i>/tr><<i></i>/table><<i></i>img src="http://www.geocities.com/ghettoprops/sars.txt" alt="omfg lol"><<i></i>table>

If that doesn't work, I'm lost. And Peeg: Tough cookies. :)

edczxcvbnm
12-13-2003, 05:29 AM
What it is that by ending the table it brings my picture all the way to the right side of the table without any 'buffer' for lack of a better word. Notice how my sig is not inline with the left edge of the line and everyone else's is. By doing this I got an additional pixels that others don't have.

Shlup
12-13-2003, 07:41 AM
Originally posted by edczxcvbnm
I'm just having fun. I am not even being serious. Lighten up :riiight:

Killing is teh funz What? You're allowed to joke and I'm not? You must take me too seriously. :p

Peegee
12-13-2003, 12:26 PM
I tested the damn 565 px sig on a 800x600 res maximized in IE....wtfsars

anyway I made my image 550 px so it'll fit no matter wut.

U all sux ^^

edczxcvbnm
12-14-2003, 09:29 AM
Originally posted by ShlupQuack
What? You're allowed to joke and I'm not? You must take me too seriously. :p

You're the serious type of joker though. I never catch on with that type of humor :cry: no matter how long I hang around with a joker like that I never ever catch on and I always think they are serious.

That and you have power thus are scary :D

Shlup
12-14-2003, 05:56 PM
Thanks to somebody, the signature restrictions now officially include a 550 pixel width limit, and a fancy new disclaimer. How exciting.

To get things rolling, a gift for ed:

Strider
12-14-2003, 08:39 PM
I feel so lost in the shuffle now. Thanks a lot, guys. ;)

edczxcvbnm
12-15-2003, 04:36 AM
Originally posted by ShlupQuack
Thanks to somebody, the signature restrictions now officially include a 550 pixel width limit, and a fancy new disclaimer. How exciting.

To get things rolling, a gift for ed:

^_^

*EXPLODES WITH JOY*

Smilies and words can't even express how happy I am. OHhhhh man. Who do I get the privilage to thank for this almighty gift? Tis truely the season :cry:

*hugs shlup*

*hugs all*


How did the signature get shrunk but not loose anything? It lost no height but it lost width? Seems to look pretty normal. *Minds is offically blown*

Shlup
12-15-2003, 05:05 AM
I just figured you'd be the most likely to complain about having to change your signature, and I've had nothing to do all day anyway. ;)

I just moved the "U" and "H" closer to the "NLEAS," the "Y" closer to the "FUR" and "THE" closer to "FURY."

*is so bored today* You shoud've seen the other pointless things I used Photoshop for. :p

edczxcvbnm
12-15-2003, 05:09 AM
I don't have photoshop but I am fairly good in using it. Paint sucks for that kind of crap. You can't select stuff very well. Thank you very much shlup. I will upload the image to my server space...relativily soon. For some reason stuff is just running very very slow here right now I am gettting loads of page errors left and right.

By the way...how was 550 decided on when my current sig at 568 doesn't streach the tables? I'm just curious.

Shlup
12-15-2003, 05:11 AM
I guess some sigs were stretching at 565, while yours didn't stretch... something to do with the HTML code rather than the image or something. We just decided to make it a round number that defenitly wont stretch the tables.

edczxcvbnm
12-17-2003, 09:28 PM
*gets on the ball at last*

:D