Log in

View Full Version : Just a suggestion. 8-)



Agent Proto
05-02-2004, 03:24 AM
Well, let me see here. I would like to make a suggestion. You don't have to like this, nor will you have to approve it. I just want to point this out, and maybe have people comment on it. I don't particularly approve of it, but that's not the case.

Anyway, I would like to propose that signatures be disabled for new members for one month. Just a month. I'm sure they can live without a sig for a month, and they'll get a feeling of what's acceptable in a signature and what's not by the time they are allowed to have signatures. Just one month of a newbie to be signature-less. I like to think of it as... giving them an extra step to being cool in EoFF. 8-)

Shlup
05-02-2004, 03:42 AM
Fine with me. *dunno*

Kawaii Ryűkishi
05-02-2004, 03:45 AM
Unnecessary. Also, change is bad.

Linus
05-02-2004, 04:03 AM
I have some suggestions as well.

Most involve torture.

eestlinc
05-02-2004, 05:42 AM
i like it, but i don't have to deal with it :D

Del Murder
05-02-2004, 05:47 AM
Unnecessary. Also, change is bad.
qq[/minimumtwocharacterresponse]

EDIT: Nevermind it's unnecessary now. I should really read these forums from the bottom up.

Yamaneko
05-02-2004, 06:22 AM
It's not necessary. Also, it's bad to change.

m4tt
05-02-2004, 06:28 AM
It's not necessary. Also, it's bad to change.

Leeza
05-02-2004, 07:15 AM
Not necessary. I like checking out new sigs.

Dr Unne
05-02-2004, 07:17 AM
I say for every member, allow sigs for a month, then disallow them forever.

Shlup
05-02-2004, 07:32 AM
*tempted to agree with Unne*

I would say that it is almost necessary, seeing as the only times I've seen 3-page long sigs it was a new member.

Loony BoB
05-02-2004, 08:16 AM
I agree with everyone in this thread.

Doomgaze
05-02-2004, 09:36 AM
Just kill beloved pets of anyone with overly large signatures. They won't do it twice.

Spuuky
05-02-2004, 09:52 AM
I agree with Unne, except for the part where they get a signature for a month.

Xander
05-02-2004, 01:51 PM
Not necessary. I like checking out new sigs.

*agree*

"they'll get a feeling of what's acceptable in a signature and what's not by the time they are allowed to have signatures" - Agent Proto

They can get that straight away by reading the signature guidelines.

Just Say No To Newbie Discrimination! *waves flag* :D

Agent Proto
05-03-2004, 12:01 AM
This is not newbie discrimination. This is just something I thought would be helpful. Maybe.

It'll help out the staff a bit and it'll be easier to distinguish who's new and who's not.

But I see you guys don't like it so disregard my stupid idea. 8-)

Kirobaito
05-03-2004, 12:10 AM
Looks like you're 0 for 2 in the past week, Proto. First the whole Root Beer thing, not this.

Del Murder
05-03-2004, 12:27 AM
I don't like the idea of everyone being able to distinguish who is new and who isn't. Projects a bad image.

Agent Proto
05-03-2004, 12:28 AM
Looks like you're 0 for 2 in the past week, Proto. First the whole Root Beer thing, not this.

My root beer thing wasn't serious.

Yamaneko
05-03-2004, 12:49 AM
We take things very seriously here in Feedback.

Citizen Bleys
05-03-2004, 12:09 PM
That would be a great idea, if the object of the game is to alienate and anger new members.

Loony BoB
05-03-2004, 12:22 PM
I'm not sure it would make much of a difference anyway. Chances are the new people would just wait a month and then put up an oversized sig.

Erdrick Holmes
05-03-2004, 02:27 PM
Geez, Proto. Demanding, aren't we?