PDA

View Full Version : scene w/ Seymour in Gagazet



JseanjohnC
03-25-2005, 04:03 AM
when Seymour was telling Khimahri he should die in Gagazet what was the whole point? that was a little confusing...dont get me wrong I played this millions of times just now it got me. thanks-Josh C.

tailz
03-25-2005, 10:05 AM
seymour said he killed every other ronso and thst kimhari is the last of his race although this is confusing cause there arr lots of ronso in ffx-2

Slade
03-25-2005, 10:32 AM
also if you go back down the bottom of Gagazet theres still Ronso's down there. Not to mention theres the Ronso Blitz team....i think Seymour was lying to get Kimahri peeved

Cuchulainn
03-25-2005, 02:38 PM
Seymour was merely boasting he killed every Ronso, he killed a lot, the Ronso Warriors including Meister Kelk, Biran etc, but not all, on his way to Zanarkland when they tried to stop him, but he was simply trying to anger & confuse Kimari.

rubah
03-25-2005, 07:59 PM
That's why in x-2 It's the ronso *youths* that are rebelling. The male warriors aside from kimarhi were all dead, so it's the teen ronso and the wimmin. and kimarhi.

I thinkX.x; I haven't played through x-2 in a while so I might be wrong about that:P

JseanjohnC
03-25-2005, 08:50 PM
so ur sayin the Maester Kelk guy is dead, and along with Biran and Yenke? I was wondering why they werent in X-2...thats not cool!

Cuchulainn
03-25-2005, 09:49 PM
Yea, if you're looking for evidence of this, talk to the Ronso Fangs at Luca Port & to some ofd the Ronse at the foot of Mount Gagazet.

Fireblade13
04-15-2005, 08:53 PM
Well I hadn't even thouht of this. Oh well it didn't matter in battle I never use Kimarhi