BANNED!

[Chris]

http://:bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou::bou:/9avhp1.gif

Seriously, Mod's should use this whenever they ban someone. So when they ban someone, they should give them this as a gesture of good "Mod" behaviour.

[Psychotic]

Or they could use the dirty panda smiley. :fpdirt:

[escobert]

Or the dirty Psy smiley

[Hawkeye]

:banme

[Dreddz]

The site is too strict.......people get banned for stupid things now

[-N-]

http://www.loki7.com/banned404.html

[Cz]

http://www.loki7.com/banned404.htmlAs cool as that thing is, I don't think the staff are ever going to be cool enough to use it, or Chris' smilie. Heck, we're lucky if we get a witty comment nowadays.

[crono_logical]

That's because banning is not meant to be a humourous thing :p

[Cz]

That's news to me. :p

[Azure Chrysanthemum]

The site is too strict.......people get banned for stupid things now

So do we get an example of these "stupid things" to which you are refering to?

[escobert]

Peter?

[Leeza]

Bert, I think you of all people should be keeping out of this.

There was no one banned who didn't deserve to be banned.

That's a cute smilie, Chris. I might use it sometime. :)

[Psychotic]

There was no one banned who didn't deserve to be banned.I can think of at least three people who are banned but do not deserve to be, but nothing will change if I drag them back up again, so I choose not to name them. :fpdirt:

[Del Murder]

I can counter with three who should be banned but aren't.

[-N-]

:shifty:

[escobert]

I should not :p but who are the other two? :confused:

[Del Murder]

Here's a hint: All three of them have posted in this thread.

[Psychotic]

Del Murder, Leeza and Behold the Void.

[escobert]

Me Psy and Neel!

[Destai]

I thought it was a little unfair when Triple T was banned. I just didnt see the point of it.

[Yamaneko]

Maybe because he was a previously banned member?

[escobert]

Really? huh missed that one

[Destai]

He learned his lesson. Its just a videogame forum.

[Yamaneko]

So what you're saying is that anyone who was banned before, but has "learned his or her lesson" should be able to come back?

[Destai]

So what you're saying is that anyone who was banned before, but has "learned his or her lesson" should be able to come back?If theyre not causing trouble then yes that is what Im saying and hed already shown and proven he wasnt doing any harm.

[Psychotic]

Oh my, he did something wrong two years ago when he was a lot more immature (which was a dubious banning in the first place, in my opinion) and hasn't put a foot wrong since and was becoming a valued and popular member of the community, and even had the decency to admit to the fact that he had been previously banned. Let's ban him!

[Yamaneko]

But that involves allowing banned members to register again and show that they've changed or whatever. And if we allow exceptions for one person, then we should allow it for everyone.

[Del Murder]

He learned his lesson. Its just a videogame forum.
The same logic can be applied to why it is so important for a person to need to come back. It shouldn't be a big deal either way, so, since the forums have run pretty smoothly under the current system, that is the way it is going to be. People who break the rules will get banned, and everyone gets on with their lives, or e-lives if you'd rather.

[Destai]

But that involves allowing banned members to register again and show that they've changed or whatever. And if we allow exceptions for one person, then we should allow it for everyone.No ones suggesting you do that. I just dont think you should have bothered to ban his triple T account in the first place. Video game forum after all.



He learned his lesson. Its just a videogame forum.
The same logic can be applied to why it is so important for a person to need to come back. It shouldn't be a big deal either way, so, since the forums have run pretty smoothly under the current system, that is the way it is going to be. People who break the rules will get banned, and everyone gets on with their lives, or e-lives if you'd rather.Everyone should be allowed to enjoy themselves on this forum. If theyre not breaking any rules of course.

[Leeza]

Sounds like that's exactly what you're suggesting, Destai. Allowing him to stay on would be the same as allowing banned members to reregister.

[Destai]

Sounds like that's exactly what you're suggesting, Destai. Allowing him to stay on would be the same as allowing banned members to reregister.Im not overly concerned. His second account shouldnt have been banned because it was unnnecessary. Especially if he admitted to spamming and breaking the rules.

I dont need to rules the decide wether thats fair or unfair. Ive got common sense. But I understand why you'd be expected to uphold the rules. Just didnt see it as necessary under the circumstances.

[Leeza]

It was necessary because a banned member is a banned member regardless of what name he decides to use. If he was allowed to stay, every other banned member would want to have the same privilege.

[XxSephirothxX]

It makes me sad how nearly every topic in feedback ends up being about who should and should not be banned, and whether or not the rules are justified, yadda yadda.
:fpguilt: Saaaaad Panda.

[Destai]

It was necessary because a banned member is a banned member regardless of what name he decides to use. If he was allowed to stay, every other banned member would want to have the same privilege.He didnt deserve to be banned Leeza. He admitted to spamming ages ago and showed he had become just as good a member as me or you. Its unnecessary. I've seen things through your point of view. Give me a sign that you're returning the favour for him.

[Leeza]

Makes me sad as well, Azar.

Give it up, Destai. You don't know what he did.

[Destai]

Its unfair. If you cant see anything besides what the rules say theres a problem with your system. Because the rules say so is a terrible excuse and it doesnt make it right.

[Cz]

I like Triple T, and if I had it my way he wouldn't have been banned. The problem is, I don't have it my way and he's not coming back, no matter how much we argue. So could we please just drop the subject and use the feedback forum as it should be used, for rampant spamming and oldbie jokes?

[Leeza]

I think you'll find as you go through life that rules are put into place because it has been proven that they are needed. Such is the case here.

I agree with you BM121, which is why this thread is now closed. We are not going to rehash the same story again any more today.