PDA

View Full Version : Why............



Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:01 PM
Are the Avatar Sizes so small
I know im not using them to there max, but I just wondered why they are small.
Most forums are 100 x 100 which is ideal to me.
They were 65 x 65
Then they shrunk to 60 x 60

Why do they need to be this small ?

Hawkeye
08-30-2005, 09:02 PM
Because God created you that way

Shoeberto
08-30-2005, 09:06 PM
Because they're avatars and really aren't that important.

Strider
08-30-2005, 09:12 PM
So it doesn't look ugly and hideous and completely oversized and out of place and stuff like that.

Meat Puppet
08-30-2005, 09:21 PM
so cl_out can have bigger avatars than you

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:23 PM
yea, cl_out has a 100 x 100 avatar......

Edit : Can this site at least have one of those Image Scale down things.
So if the image is too big they will shrink it.
Cropping Images is tiresome......

Psychotic
08-30-2005, 09:26 PM
Most forums are 100 x 100 which is ideal to me.Most forums are crap.

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:27 PM
Most forums are 100 x 100 which is ideal to me.Most forums are crap.
no

crono_logical
08-30-2005, 09:35 PM
I don't think EoFF has ever had 65x65 avatars :p

And mine's bigger because someone else changed my avatar and I was too lazy to find the original to fix it so just dug out the first avatarish picture I could find on my computer :p

EDIT: It's 90x90 anyway, not 100x100, so I think I must have used it on MSN at one point :p

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:39 PM
I don't think EoFF has ever had 65x65 avatars
No, Im positive we had 65 x 65 avatars.

Shoeberto
08-30-2005, 09:41 PM
I don't think EoFF has ever had 65x65 avatars
No, Im positive we had 65 x 65 avatars.
Nope, cl_out's right. It's always been 60x60.

Yamaneko
08-30-2005, 09:43 PM
Fool's Gold would love to have you.

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:44 PM
what !?!
Im certain that the site was 65 x 65....

Azure Chrysanthemum
08-30-2005, 09:45 PM
60x60. Always.

Leeza
08-30-2005, 09:51 PM
They have always been 60 x 60 and it is one way to have them all neat and uniform. If the limits were any larger, we would have some at 60 x 60, some at 70 x 70, some at 80 x 80, some at 100 x 100 and the place would be terribly messy.

You come here to post and not show off your avatar, don't you?

crono_logical
08-30-2005, 09:51 PM
I know it's been 60x60, because there's been an argument before about why the avatars shouldn't be 64x64 or larger instead because another forum used them and someone wanted to use the same avatars, but 60x60 was too small to allow them to do that :p

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:52 PM
then wth did I think there was a 65 x 65
OMFG there must of been 65 x 65 at some point
Im so sure on this........

MecaKane
08-30-2005, 09:54 PM
You're going to have to trust the people who've been here longer than a year on this one.

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:55 PM
Im just wondering why I thought that there was 65 x 65
I was so sure......

Psychotic
08-30-2005, 09:55 PM
Most forums are 100 x 100 which is ideal to me.Most forums are crap.
noYes. Although I cannot claim to have visited every single forum on the internet, you can rest assured that most of them will be terrible and filled with morons.

Leeza
08-30-2005, 09:57 PM
The only time that they were bigger than 60 x 60 was when Dr Unne went nuts one day and gave everyone that logged in a new avatar.

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 09:57 PM
Most forums are 100 x 100 which is ideal to me.Most forums are crap.
noYes. Although I cannot claim to have visited every single forum on the internet, you can rest assured that most of them will be terrible and filled with morons.



in DNB arena, there is no limit on sigs ( but theres no avatars )
And that place has 60,0000 members
So saying that Avatars, sigs sizes matter is not true..........

Leeza
08-30-2005, 10:02 PM
Well, then I guess they don't care how long it takes for their pages to load or if they have more sigs on their site compared to actual post sizes. Not that I know what site you're talking about, but when there is no limit to sigs, some of them can be quite huge.

Shoeberto
08-30-2005, 10:06 PM
Not that I know what site you're talking about, but when there is no limit to sigs, some of them can be quite huge.
...not to mention annoying, obnoxious, and often times containing questionable material. I've been to sites without sig limits. It's pretty bad.

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 10:43 PM
DNB isnt messed up

Madonna
08-30-2005, 10:47 PM
I guess they don't care how long it takes for their pages to load or if they have more sigs on their site compared to actual post sizes.Just in case someone missed what was said in Leeza's post.

I like my large .gif (http://akusui.net/lynx_parasitic/_giftproject/tselu_auronsexysig.gif) sigs, but I'm not allowed them here. I deal.

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 10:50 PM
lol, your sig is the best......

boris no no
08-30-2005, 10:55 PM
they're not about to change it
so deal with it i guess ;p

DocFrance
08-30-2005, 10:56 PM
I demand a 1000x1000 avatar limit!

Dreddz
08-30-2005, 10:58 PM
Can we at least have a Image Scale on. PLEASE !!!!!!

Cloud No.9
08-31-2005, 12:01 AM
i refuse to have an avatar or sig. make them tiny!!!

Vyk
08-31-2005, 12:40 AM
Its better than AIM buddy icons :D

MoonsEcho
08-31-2005, 12:56 AM
Large avatars and sigs are eyesores. Everything is fine the way it is.

Faris
08-31-2005, 01:01 AM
I agree with MoonsEcho. When you see all sorts of sizes while looking at a thread. You start thinking that they're alive, or your eyes are playing a trick on you.

Samuraid
08-31-2005, 01:12 AM
Why do they need to be this small ?

Simple. So something like this doesn't happen:
http://eyesonff.com/samuraid/hugeanimgif.png
Yes, that is a real animated GIF avatar on the dbz tribute forums.

Agent Proto
08-31-2005, 01:44 AM
The way the forums are, having larger avatars would make the forums look messier. For the record, EoFF always used 60 x 60.

nik0tine
08-31-2005, 01:55 AM
I demand a 1000x1000 avatar limit!

Agent Proto
08-31-2005, 01:58 AM
60 x 60 avatars are more aesthetically appealing than larger avatar anyway.

Polyonymous
08-31-2005, 02:23 AM
I agree that it is tough to get a good avatar to 60 x 60 (at least for me), but I do like it better this way.

Sepho
08-31-2005, 02:41 AM
I'm pretty used to the 60x60 avatar size. I think anything considerably larger looks kind of tacky.

rubah
08-31-2005, 02:45 AM
I for one wouldn't mind a larger avatar size, but after a while of watching, I have come to the realization that it is not going to happen.

<del>although I wish we could use lj icons ;_;</del>

MecaKane
08-31-2005, 03:03 AM
Maybe we can have 50kb avatars with 5kb sigs! <_<

Dr Unne
08-31-2005, 03:11 AM
I think the actual reason for this is that EZBoard only allowed 60x60.

Meat Puppet
08-31-2005, 03:31 AM
Hey cool, proto used my title for him. :smash:

Shlup
08-31-2005, 04:47 AM
I would not want to be a member of a 60,0000 member message board. Quantity != Quality

Polyonymous
08-31-2005, 04:56 AM
Maybe we could make the filesize of the avatars a little bigger... maybe :-/

theundeadhero
08-31-2005, 05:08 AM
I've become so accustomed to the EOFF style of avatars, sigs, and everything that anything else just looks bad to me. It's not hard at all to stay within the limits.

Hawkeye
08-31-2005, 05:13 AM
its so fudrucking stoopid though!!1 :mad2:

Honestly, it doesnt bother me. If it were to increase, I might make my avatar bigger to fit since and snug into the limits, but it's fine for my tastes

Jojee
08-31-2005, 06:33 AM
Lynxie: Oh my god. xD Your sig. *falls over*

And 60 x 60 avatars are big enough ^_^ although I go to forums that use 100 x 100 and it doesn't look terribly messy. I don't mind, either way.

escobert
08-31-2005, 07:48 AM
I've become so accustomed to the EOFF style of avatars, sigs, and everything that anything else just looks bad to me. It's not hard at all to stay within the limits.
Same here since It's pretty much the only forum I go to.

Shlup
08-31-2005, 08:19 AM
I vote 40x40.

Jojee
08-31-2005, 08:32 AM
K, your vote sucks. >=|

theundeadhero
08-31-2005, 08:44 AM
If the picture you want is too big then open it in paint, go to Image~stretch/skew~and then decrease it in percentages instead of cropping. You don't loose any of your picture that way.

Cz
08-31-2005, 11:39 AM
60x60 is traditional, and the golden rule of EoFF is to never break tradition, no matter how sensible (or stupid) the suggestion may be. Besides, it's not exactly hard to resize an image yourself. Even MS Paint can do it, for Chrissakes.

Dreddz
08-31-2005, 11:57 AM
I demand the avatars to be 70 x 70 !

Master Quan
08-31-2005, 11:59 AM
I vote 40x40.

Old Manus
08-31-2005, 12:00 PM
FORUM WAR

Meat Puppet
08-31-2005, 02:13 PM
Rumour has it that having boobies in your avatar is the secret cheat to unlocking 70 x 70 avatars. cl_out will back me up on this. :excited:

Hawkeye
08-31-2005, 02:37 PM
What kind of boobies???11 :excited:

Psychotic
08-31-2005, 06:11 PM
Blue footed boobies, duh. :excited:

Destai
08-31-2005, 06:18 PM
Most forums are 100 x 100 which is ideal to me.Most forums are crap.
noYes. Although I cannot claim to have visited every single forum on the internet, you can rest assured that most of them will be terrible and filled with morons.*witty comment*

Master Quan
08-31-2005, 06:21 PM
Yes. Although I cannot claim to have visited every single forum on the internet, you can rest assured that most of them will be terrible and filled with morons.

Doubtless many think the same of EoFF, remember Something Awful?

RSL
08-31-2005, 06:23 PM
Have you ever been to something awful? They have plenty of idiots themselves.

Destai
08-31-2005, 06:25 PM
Yes. Although I cannot claim to have visited every single forum on the internet, you can rest assured that most of them will be terrible and filled with morons.

Doubtless many think the same of EoFF, remember Something Awful?Thats what I was trying to say just in case it wasnt clear.

Master Quan
08-31-2005, 06:30 PM
Have you ever been to something awful? They have plenty of idiots themselves.

Exactly.

Psychotic
08-31-2005, 06:35 PM
EoFF has morons, every forum does, but we're not filled with them.

-N-
08-31-2005, 07:23 PM
Just don't go south of the border and you're fine. Or north of the border, for that matter. In fact, just to be safe, you'd better just stick around in the General Archive.

fire_of_avalon
08-31-2005, 07:56 PM
I think the avatars should be 60 x 60. *deadpan for no reason*

Hawkeye
09-01-2005, 12:24 AM
EoFF has morons, every forum does, but we're not filled with them.
The majority of morons on these forums are named Psychotic anyways :rolleyes2

Psychotic
09-01-2005, 12:27 AM
As much as I try to fill the forums, I don't think I have yet succeeded.

Hawkeye
09-01-2005, 12:28 AM
Keep trying, fido. Psy_is_great are awesome starts

Psychotic
09-01-2005, 12:30 AM
That account has nothing to do with me. It's Meat Puppet. I can't get him to stop it. Sometimes he leaves me little surprises on my pillow. Help. :(

rubah
09-01-2005, 12:53 AM
Just don't go south of the border and you're fine. Or north of the border, for that matter. In fact, just to be safe, you'd better just stick around in the General Archive.
What are you talking. Mexico is the best place ever.

ZeZipster
09-01-2005, 12:57 AM
What sense would 65 x 65 make? 60 x 60 is AIM's size. 100 x 100 is MSN's size. Those are the only reasonable sizes to be used. I think 60 x 60 is perfectly reasonable. However, I'm not too fond of the 6 kb limit that limit seems to come out of no where. I doubt that'll ever be changed though.

I like MecaKane's idea. I could so easily resize my sig to 60 x 60. =D

rubah
09-01-2005, 01:24 AM
Actually msn's size is 98x98.

Meat Puppet
09-01-2005, 02:28 AM
APE RAPE

Sephex
09-01-2005, 07:24 AM
I like the smaller avitars. No reason why, though.

Loony BoB
09-01-2005, 12:41 PM
Can you let me have a bigger avatar?
No. Use a smaller resolution on your screen and the pictures will appear to be bigger.

*makes fun of you (http://eyesonff.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38129)*

Reine
09-01-2005, 02:09 PM
Yes keep them at 60x60, but Image Scale would definetly be helpful. I spent an hour trying to get the dimensions just right (60x61) and get the right picture, and no, the stretch skew on Paint squashs and warps the picture, and the end result is terible. Ive tried this. Image Scale is great most of the time, but it's NEVER going to happen.

Loony BoB
09-01-2005, 02:16 PM
Yes keep them at 60x60, but Image Scale would definetly be helpful. I spent an hour trying to get the dimensions just right (60x61) and get the right picture, and no, the stretch skew on Paint squashs and warps the picture, and the end result is terible. Ive tried this. Image Scale is great most of the time, but it's NEVER going to happen.
If you want to resize your picture, just download a small, simple program called IrfanView. It takes up minimal space and memory and does the job effectively. You should be able to find the download site for it using a quick web search for 'IrfanView'.

DK
09-01-2005, 03:47 PM
http://uk.cricinfo.com/db/PICTURES/DB/022004/049994.jpg

Loony BoB
09-01-2005, 03:49 PM
xDDD You legend.

Resha
09-01-2005, 04:33 PM
My HERO! <3 Both of you. xD

Crystal Tears
09-01-2005, 10:01 PM
Smaller avatars look quite cute, but sometimes to get one with what you want in you have to cram it in, so it can look a bit messy and illegible. It would probably easier for people to have nicer images if the 6K was change to maybe 10K? I have a feeling that it's for the poor people who are still on dial up so their computers don't explode with too much information.

~*Crystal

Mirage
09-01-2005, 10:16 PM
ACTUALLY MSN IS 96X96
LOL

Ashley Schovitz
09-10-2005, 06:32 PM
How am I supposed to get mine? It's the greatest in the world but I can't put it in and it's barely over someone told me to resize it but how do I do it, the avy I want you can find at avy service thread.

Leeza
09-10-2005, 07:13 PM
Avvy thread.

http://forums.eyesonff.com/showthread.php?t=43913

Right next to the siggy thread.

Fuzakeru
09-11-2005, 12:46 AM
Sometimes its a pain in the arse to find a good avy but just think of it as an oppurtunity to be creative. EoFF is only trying to excercise your intelligence and make your bones strong. :spin:

Max
09-19-2005, 04:31 AM
This isnt fool's gold people...

DocFrance
09-20-2005, 05:15 AM
I know the perfect solution to the problem. Anyone who complains about not being able to have bigger avatars should be forced to have a 10 by 400 avatar. Technically, that <i>is</i> bigger than 60 by 60.

Shlup
09-20-2005, 05:20 AM
But then we'd have to look at them. Then entire point is uniformity, duuuuh.

I say we build a wall. And whoever complains about something stupid gets their username on it. And then once a week we make a thread to make fun of them for being stupid.