PDA

View Full Version : Michael Moore



Traitorfish
10-04-2005, 09:53 PM
This is about his movies, not politics. I know they're sort of tied together, but I'm trying to see what people think of him as a director, not an activist/hero/filthy socialist weasel.

Leeza
10-04-2005, 10:05 PM
I liked Bowling for Columbine and thought it was well done. I slept through Farenheit 9/11 so I couldn't tell you about that one. And that's all I've seen.

Chris
10-04-2005, 10:06 PM
I know who he is, but I don't recognize any of those movies.

Max
10-04-2005, 10:19 PM
I really hate that guy. He blows things totally out of proportion. I have seen Bowling for Columbine, he makes some good points, but mostly I disagree with everything he says.

nik0tine
10-05-2005, 12:15 AM
He has a way with demonizing just about everybody he comes into contact with to promote his point of veiw. With that said, I liked Farenheit 9/11 the most.

DMKA
10-05-2005, 12:21 AM
I've seen two of his films: Farenheight 9/11 and Bowling for Columbine...

I liked alot of the points in Bowling for Columbine, but I thought some of it was pure BS to the point of lol. It was the film I prefered.

Farenheight 9/11 was very interesting, and I liked it, even though I'm pretty sure his purpose for making that on was less than nobel.

As for what I think of the man as a whole? He's a big fat silly billy.

Shlup
10-05-2005, 06:06 AM
I only saw Farenheit 9/11 and I didn't think it was very well put together. Not necessarily bad, but certainly not good either. I like to watch documentaries, and I thought that one was just not up to par.

Yamaneko
10-05-2005, 06:46 AM
I very much enjoyed his propaganda films!

nik0tine
10-05-2005, 07:15 AM
im so sick of u ppl hating on michael more ur all fascists

Shadowdust
10-05-2005, 07:30 AM
As a director, I feel he's fairly decent. As for his documentaries, I'm sure there's many that would call him a "propagandaist" but then so are all people who ask questions in times of extreme patriotism. Whether you agree with his films or not, you have to respect the fact that he's taking risks by asking questions no one wants to ask.

Currently, I'm reading this book called Lies My Teacher Told Me. It actually considers many things in history that we are not taught in school for the sake of glorifying individuals in history. Perhaps, not knowing the full truth about our history keeps us from learning from our mistakes. Instead we repeat these mistakes over and over. Perhaps, if we started questioning our government more, we could see a real change in our future rather than the repetition of historical events. :)

Skyblade
10-05-2005, 08:40 AM
I think they're all junk.

Fellowship 9/11, now there was a piece of high quality work...

?????
10-05-2005, 08:55 AM
Michael Moore is a fat dick.

nik0tine
10-05-2005, 08:58 AM
Rush Limbaugh is a fat dick.

?????
10-05-2005, 09:59 AM
Him too.

Traitorfish
10-07-2005, 11:22 PM
He has a way with demonizing just about everybody he comes into contact with to promote his point of veiw.
True, but then, what to you expect? He's talking about men who start wars because of greed. The reason he demonizes them is the same reason Castro never stood up and said 'Now this Batista. I know he's got a lot of bad press lately, but he's a pretty good guy, really'.
Besides, he's usually right... a lot of those guys are monsters...


I only saw Farenheit 9/11 and I didn't think it was very well put together. Not necessarily bad, but certainly not good either. I like to watch documentaries, and I thought that one was just not up to par.
Actually, I have to agree with you there- Farenheit 9/11 seemed a little sloppy. A lot of it felt like he was so busy trying to shock you, that he let the actual quality of the film slide.
Bowling for Columbine is excellent, though. Wether or not you agree with is message, you must admit it's very well filmed.