PDA

View Full Version : Who knows the first law of equvilent exchange by heart on FMA?



Rikku_Yuffie_girl
04-05-2006, 01:04 AM
I do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Human kind can not gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain something of equal value must be lost. This is alchemys first law of equivent exchange:) :) I have watched it so much i know it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

FMA ROCKS:) :) :) :)

DK
04-05-2006, 01:29 AM
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y203/Birdo90210/YOU_FAIL_AT_LIFE.png

Despotus
04-05-2006, 01:34 AM
The first law of equivolent exchange is "we do not talk about equivolent exchange."

The second law of equivolent exchange is "WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT EQUIVOLENT EXCHANGE!"

Who didn't see that coming...:D

Apologies, but is this a band or a movie or what? I should look it up if you're recommending it. ;)

Venom
04-05-2006, 02:04 AM
The first law of equivalent exchange is to have protection on.

I'll let your teacher tell you 2 and 3.

~SapphireStar~
04-05-2006, 02:14 AM
Is this another FMA thread merely created for the 2 FMA obsessed fans by the 2 FMA obsessed fans?

edczxcvbnm
04-05-2006, 02:18 AM
WRONG!

Avarice-ness
04-05-2006, 02:22 AM
The second law is the Sulfer (or silver I forget) principle.
Oh... wait.. FMA.. Not Jabir's actual alchemic theory made way back in the extreme olden days. xD

And let's go with 3 or 4 fans now. :D

Zeromus_X
04-05-2006, 02:25 AM
The next law.

Wait until you see the last four episodes or so xD

Rikku_Yuffie_girl
04-05-2006, 02:41 AM
okay I thought we talked about this before :mad2: Are you saying im obsessed with FMA:mad2: And if your talking about me and kid_cronocrossrules you better stop while your ahead. We like it okay were not obsessed with it. Well you know what, I think your obsessed with agrueing with me:mad2:
theres nothing wrong with FMA

~SapphireStar~
04-05-2006, 02:42 AM
Not aruging with you cause thats all you want. Wheres that warn button?

Azure Chrysanthemum
04-05-2006, 02:42 AM
Stop making FMA threads. We have more than enough. This thread doesn't even constitute a valid topic. This is a warning.