...I don't even?
:D hmph. then what the hell is the flag code for? Also it states you can't use it for bedding, as a container (to wrap stuff in, I suppose), etc.
It also would be legal in D.C. So-called flag desecration is protected by the First Amendment. See Texas v. Johnson (striking down state ban on flag burning).
Information on committee proceedings is notoriously opaque: committees vary in what information they make public and often do not provide basic public information such as the results of votes electronically or in an understandable format. Furthermore, if your Member of Congress does not sit on any committee relevant to this bill, you generally have no opportunity to voice your opinion on the bill while the bill is receiving its most important consideration. I wish I could blame the public itself for its ignorance, but the government is making it hard because of how much it plays a part in it xD
:D good point quin. why do we even have a court when we should just own up to crimes?
TheRecord - Man shocked by arrest after daughter draws picture of... Wow... That's retarded. PG, why do you keep posting these things that make me hate humans even more than I already do?
You should accept responsibility for your actions rather than condone cops who don't do their jobs properly.
:D thanks - my phone is meh
Also, that's some bulltrout. Courts are getting dumber and dumber.
Fixed your link for you Ohio man given choice of Facebook apology or jail - Yahoo! News
Raistlin, I totally agree. But far to many people get in deep trouble by scoffing for getting pulled over. Most cops strike some sort of deal with you, or let you off unless you were driving like a jerk or whatever.
Carrying a card seems pointless at best, but I wholeheartedly encourage everyone to precisely follow all of those statements. Do not talk to the police if you could remotely be considered a suspect for anything; always demand an attorney first; and never, ever, EVER consent to a search of anything. Sephex: it's a sad indictment of modern police officers that some may actually be "instigated" by a simple expression of one's rights. People need to say "no" to cops more.
You show something like this to a cop, you are pretty much asking for all sorts of trouble. Not that I have ever been in trouble too much, but my few minor run ins with cops (mainly being pulled over, and one time because I was WAY too drunk at a friend's house) weren't that bad. I showed them complete respect, and all was well at the end of the day. I should have had four speeding tickets on my record now, but I got out of it. Again, I know that there are WORSE situations and that Cops can be jerks, but it is THOSE Cops that would get really nasty if you instigate them with this sort of deal.
To me this seems like something hipsters and criminals would carry, to be honest.
PG: I'm with you. I was just saying that's what the judge's attitude was towards the atheist.
Nothing against religion, but I'm afraid I must agree with Dr. House.
:D That should be irrelevant. He was exercising his freedom of expression. I can't remember the details but I hope he appeals.
The judge probably ruled against him since he was an atheist, I'm guessing.
What the smurf. State lower court judges can be monumentally stupid.
leeza, shlupquack, buttheponcho, miriel, del murder, kishi, Necronopticous, sean, sean's wife, strider, araciel, chemical, enano, mindflare, rubah, hsu, denmark, farah, jktrix, ouch!, jojo, edczxcvbnm, clouded sky, agrias, skye-chan, kalen, theabominatrix, chimp, dignified pauper, misfit, nikki, will, neotifa this year: shion, lynx, kalilung, shorty, and julian
Blog Categories
Go to Profile
Mark as Read
