Recently, the Maryland Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) did a mind-bogglingly stupid thing. Normally, a dog owner (or a landlord that allows a certain dog on the premises) is not negligent for simply having or allowing a dog that bites someone else, unless there's evidence that the owner knew or should have known that the individual dog was dangerous. For instance, a history of attacks or aggressive behavior. That has now changed in Maryland, at least for pit bulls. In ...
Updated 05-17-2012 at 11:28 PM by Raistlin
Blog Categories
Recent Visitors
Go to Profile
Mark as Read
