View RSS Feed

rubah's Precious Little Life

The Elton John Magazine Cover Scandal (a.k.a. non-allies aren't necessarily enemies)

Rate this Entry
*rubs temples*

Okay, last week a local grocery chain made some minor local news about a store in a remote part of the state putting a "Family shield" in front of magazines that featured Elton John, his partner, and their son.

Some gay allies called the headquarters, complaining about this censorship of homosexual partnerships, so the manager at the store was made to take off the shield.

This, along with a press release explaining the family shield policy, which seems to bespeak a fairly clean cut "a couple of people complained, so we did this, but that made more unhappy, so we reversed it", but because they are taking a fairly neutral stance (remember, this is Arkansas) and not a more proactive one in favor of gay rights, there continues to be a call to boycott all their stores.

Meanwhile, my bigoted cousin (who is a pretty good weathercock of the Tea Party mentality) is posting to his facebook how we should be heaping praise on Chick-Fil-A for openly supporting anti-gay causes, and chiding this grocery store for pandering to a "vocal minority."


I mean, it would be great if they had been more supportive in that press release, but goddamn, why turn away even half-hearted support?

I read a quote one time that the main problem with the [Democratic Party/Liberals] is that they get too focused on their differences than on similarities.
Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Old Manus's Avatar
    Criticising democrats and liberals isn't allowed on the internet.
  2. Yar's Avatar
    No rubahs I totally agree.

    Also, when loudmouth gay rights groups like this make a scene, please note that they do not speak for the entire community! They're sometimes just being whiny like whiny-groups be. It doesn't matter where they stand on the political spectrum they just whine for attention.

    Personally, I thought covering the magazine was wrong (although it was a tabloid wasn't it? hmmm maybe they just shouldn't sell that junk in general...) BUT when they took off the cover that was good. Whining that they aren't pro-gay is absurd. ITS A STORE PEOPLE
  3. rubah's Avatar
    Nah, it was US. I don't think that's a tabloid, anyway.

    I can kinda rationalize covering it if you're personally not in favor of gay adoption, and you've gotten calls asking for it. It's surprising that anyone in that town got offended, honestly. Kinda reassuring, though, that even in the deep dark woods, there are still progressive people.