I plan on writing an immense philosophy book one day that will make absolutely no sense but will still be taught at college. Like Russell.
So it's like turning a sentence into maths? xD Philosophers are bastards which makes them something to aspire towards. Wouldn't you love to torment budding young minds one day in the future while you're resting in your lavish crypt?
Predicate logic is the use of symbols and letters to represent constants (names of things - e.g. Jiro), predicates (propositions of things - e.g. is tall), relations (e.g. is taller than), variables (when no constant is given - e.g. some, every) and quantifiers (used to complicate things unnecessarily because philosophers are bastards). I've yet to find a sentence where a quantifier is needed.
Well that's because I'm not entirely certain what predicate logic is (and despite my intense desire to know what it is, I still haven't google'd it. Goddamn I'm lazy). That being said, I wonder how well your answer was taken. Sometimes you can luck out and your answer will be close enough to the answer and humorous enough to score a good mark
But it's irrelevant to the question, so it didn't matter.
See! There's always a way around a contradiction. All you gotta do is make up some bull story and change the facts a little bit. (Successfully) Cheating is the only way to ensure victory no matter the circumstances.
Well, it's actually a contradiction. If you like everyone then you must like John. Unless, of course, John is actually a dog or something which may not necessarily fit into the "everyone" category.
But you can still have fun trying to work out how it could actually happen. So many possibilities!
Haha it's a hypothetical thing. The meaning isn't important.
That is a dick of a question. Evidently John mustn't be apart of "everyone". Maybe John is the dog. And nobody likes him because he s all over their lawns. Also who the smurf likes everyone? I don't like everyone and I'm a pretty friendly guy. Goddamn question.
