It's like Lawrence.
Seems legit.
Also http://www.azlyricdb.com/lyrics/Daru...0#.VR10FI7Rsw0
http://distractify.com/rob-fee/13-th...-sex/?ts_pid=2
Ugh
Hey, sperm need R.E.M. sleep like the rest of us.
http://distractify.com/megan-mccormi...ing-to-tumblr/ #14: Are you a US senator?
A) The fictional future has no room for homosexuality. Star Wars is another fine example, except for maybe C3PO. B) Those people make me really, really hope for better accepted homosexuality in the not-so fictional future, because then maybe they'll all find same sex lovers and not breed.
http://9gag.com/gag/azEdnXj Seen a few of them, but there's some new ones in there Also, found this under TVTropes for homosexuality portrayed in media (SPOILER) Star Trek is infamous for this, even though Gene Roddenberry asserted that humanity would have advanced beyond anti-gay prejudice in his idealized future, and claimed he would introduce a gay character on Star Trek: The Next Generation. His statements were disregarded by later producers to an almost militant degree. Complaints from fans were usually met with half-hearted appeasement in the form of Very Special Episodes that relied on Bizarre Alien Biology as a metaphor for homosexuality, bisexuality or transgenderism. No human characters are ever depicted as anything other than heterosexual, although they will frequently engage in Interspecies Romance so long as their partner at least identifies as being of the opposite-sex. TNG's fourth-season episode "The Host" is easily the worst example of this, as the ending has Crusher state that she can only view men romantically or sexually, and states that this is the way "her people" (humans, seemingly as a whole) are. She even says that "One day, our love may not be so limited" in direct refutation of Roddenberry's idea that by this time, our love isn't this limited. It's interesting
<3
