I only said that after he insulted me with his troll post where he started out like: "T$%@$%@#R$@RQWR@$@%%@%"
Fair enough, I didn't mean to insult you. I only started bringing insults into this when MILF posted his conga line of trolling, and that didn't have anything to do with you, but I attacked you both at the same time anyway. Here's where I used sources: http://home.eyesonff.com/eyes-each-o...ml#post3077551
First, is there some reason you can't leave a single visitor message instead of three? Second, when you actually link to some articles in the thread where we were having our discussion, I'll be more than happy to give your position more consideration. Third, once you stop misusing fairly common and readily understood terms, any discussion we have will probably be more productive. Fourth, simply saying that minimum wage is meant to be a starting wage and increase over time doesn't make it reality. In many jobs it will not increase barring a promotion and not even then sometimes. Fifth, when you can have a conversation without resorting to insults against those with a differing opinion, thinly veiled or otherwise like calling people Libtards, then I'll be happy to talk to you. In the meantime you aren't worth the effort. It's amazing you speak of mental capacity and maturity when you choose to attack those who disagree with you rather than confront them rationally with evidence.
And what makes you think I was referring to your physical body? I could just as well have been referring to your mental capacity and/or maturity.
Then you apparently haven't looked very hard at either thread, might I suggest you glance them over again.
The minimum wage for these entry level jobs is just that. In other words, kiddo, that's the starting wage and it increases over time. I know some of these may be big words for you, and if you have trouble understanding, I would be more than happy to explain them to you.
You know, you can't really call someone who's more than 7 years your senior older than you. Just sounds strange. And I have absolutely no problem with people disagreeing with me. I just expect them to make a reasoned, logical argument, and back it up with facts. You've yet to do that with regard to any of your wilder claims despite repeated requests to do so. The most likely reason being because you can't back those claims up. If you could, a reasonable person would have by now. And I'm not referring to your comments in the War and Peace thread because: A) I never engaged you in discussion there, and; B) As far as I can tell from quickly skimming it you quoted no articles, cited no sources or anything else. I don't know if you even know what asking for your sources means now.
You're so full of yourself, kiddo, that you can't even admit that someone could ever possibly disagree with you. I also posted several other sources backing up my statements in the War and Peace thread.
That speech was the only thing you linked to, and wasn't even the thing we wanted evidence of. What Obama says isn't nearly as important as what he's done and you've never done anything to prove your claims about him or anyone or anything else. Try harder kid. Also, there are plenty of people who are able bodied and out of work through absolutely no fault of their own, and not because they choose not to work. If you don't understand that then it's not worth debating any further with you.
What I'm saying is that we shouldn't give welfare to the able-bodied. I'm not necessarily opposed to welfare for those who truly cannot take care of themselves. However if someone can work and chooses not to, then we should just let them die.
