Feedback Constitution

with the help of Kishi, I wrote up a quick Constitution for the Feedback forum. All staff members and regular members posting in Feedback must abide by these laws, according to Article 1 in the Feedback Constitution.

WesM 118: Article One: Listen to Raistlin. Always.

WesM 118: Article Two: In the absence of Raistlin, listen to Doomgaze.

WesM 118: Article Three: In the absence of the above two, email HOOTERS.

WesM 118: Article Four: In the absence of the first two and HOOTERS, the problem can be solved simply by asking the question, "What would HOOTERS have done?"

Kishiruni: Posted tits.

WesM 118: Article Five: In the absence of a conclusion as to what HOOTERS would want, post tits.

WesM 118: Article Five, subsection 1: immediately ban the person stupid enough to actually post tits. There, problem solved!

(. Y .)

Article Five, subsection 2: In the absence of tits.jpg, listen to edcnkcnslkccnmdkvndzcxvbnm.

What about me? >=o

Article 6: if no one else can be found, ask Proto and do the exact opposite of whatever he tells you.

:p

me?

Article 7: Jojo is only 4'11" and her name must be changed to "twerp" with custom title "4'11" midget" if she ever denies it.

This constitution sucks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raistlin

However, there are times with I believe it is absolutely necessary for Staff to be professional. Feedback is one of them. When a member suggests something, especially if they are in some form giving feedback to staff(usually to critique) in a serious manner, than I believe it's necessary to respond in turn.

---

I've given your thread serious consideration and I have decided that in order to maintain my professionalism, I really must close it. If feedback is to be taken in a serious manner, then this doesn't belong here.

There's always next year.