:O

http://forums.eyesonff.com/member.php?u=17537 Should I assume that sig is what it looks like? Cause yeah.

No pun intended, I swear.

I see fingers.

Nothing pr0n0graphic there, so I guess it's ok... for now. It's just some fingers on someone's thigh or whatever, and the figure is clearly clothed, albeit minimally.

If people start copying this kind of thing, though, we might need to clamp down.

That's a thigh? I thought it was a couch.

I believe you are right. At first glance, it looked like someone's posterior clad by minimal undergarments.

I'm sure Freud would have enjoyed all this.

I was looking at that earlier and I couldn't figure out what it was. It's a man's hand, but the body is female. I didn't see any nipples so I figured it's okay.

What does it look like to you, foa? :)

Well, it looks like foa's mind is a dirty as mine. omg.
My perception of that sig was probably influenced by the fact that there was a thread about it in Staff. I tend to assume the worst when that happens...

Booty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leeza

I was looking at that earlier and I couldn't figure out what it was. It's a man's hand, but the body is female.

---

I don't think it's a body at all... it looks like a close-up of the seams on a leather couch. The shadows at the bottom (no pun intended) look wrong.

It probably is a couch because if you look closer it would be a pretty flat booty, if that's what it is.

I give this thread a 10.

Oh, assume. Pun. I get it now. :)

You see what you want to see. Thus I have concluded that you all hate your fathers.

I have concluded this thread should be archived before it has a chance to get less funny.