the war is officially over

today it was decreed that all arms of the IRA had been decomissioned. every accountable, handgun, rifle, mortar, missle, grenade and bomb put beyond use and destroyed. the ira as a violent organistion is over. also the criminality of the ira has also ended since it's statement in june.

this means that the terrorism and war from the ira is now once and for all done. 30 years of violence and a 100 year fight for independance ended today. witnessed and verified.

and the unionist response? well ignore the fact that they just broke their cease fire and had a bit of a riot last week. they said it wasn't good enough and were not prepared to do the same and disarm.

but now the rest of the peace process will start. the removal of symbols and coats of arms, the watch towers, the ruc and maybe the parliament will reopen.

but today the war with the ira ended.

Too bad. I was rather hoping that Ireland would eventually become independent.

Then again, I can't say I would have liked the IRA, as such, to be the ones to head that new government. Yeah... getting rid of the IRA is a good thing. And they used to have such lovely ideals.

I honestly don't understand the political ramifications of any of this at all, but I'm glad the fighting's over. It had been ravaging that region for far too long.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Man

I honestly don't understand the political ramifications of any of this at all, but I'm glad the fighting's over. It had been ravaging that region for far too long.

---

Yeah what the last to crappers said. :D Go America!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by udsuna

Too bad. I was rather hoping that Ireland would eventually become independent.

---

The IRA murdered thousands of innocents - "too bad" is hardly how I'd describe their disarmament.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Big D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by udsuna

Too bad. I was rather hoping that Ireland would eventually become independent.

---

The IRA murdered thousands of innocents - "too bad" is hardly how I'd describe their disarmament.

---

Thank you.

As you can probably see from other threads, I'm far from convinced by this. Hopeful, but not convinced. Nevertheless, thirty years of bending over backwards to accomodate terrorists isn't a proud mark in Britain's pages.

Edit: I could name another war which has been officially over for some time now, but which people are only too happy to point out the violence in the region continues. Of course, rather than place the blame on the people doing the killing-and-maiming bit, they're probably going to blame Blair for not making enough concessions.

Or Bush. Bush is a good condidate for blame.

Hmm... I prefer to think that Britain's strategies (regarding the IRA) have been fairly solid, considering the circumstances. Not overbearingly violent and oppressive, since that'd inevitably harm the innocent more than the guilty, and pursuing a peaceful solution - even where it called for compromise. But even though peace was the ultimate goal, they weren't afraid to use force where it was needed. A combination of brain and brawn, perhaps.

Quote:

---

Of course, rather than place the blame on the people doing the killing-and-maiming bit, they're probably going to blame Blair for not making enough concessions.

Or Bush. Bush is a good condidate for blame.

---

I'd have to disagree on this point, since the latest round of military action in Iraq was instigated by outside forces, with the first civilian deaths of the war coming from "our" bombs. Now, of course, the situation's different - the presence of coalition forces in Iraq is essential to the rebuilding and stabilising of the country, and this'll naturally require a 'hard line' against those who're trying to further the cycles of violence. However, even though there's still a lot of hostility there, overwhelming military force cannot prevail - since it'll only divide, injure and provoke the innocent populations whose wellbeing is meant to be one of the primary objectives.

or Britain could just pull out of Northern Ireland like they pulled out of the rest of their colonial holdings. Why are the Irish any less deserving of freedom than Indians, or South Africans, or Americans?

Britian is still the head of state for 18 nations, 2 of which are suspended.

Agus sin é... buiochas le Dia.

If they don't want to be under british control then they should have that right. All it takes is them not paying taxes and stuff like that. Then when big bad britian comes knock tell them to smurf off...or something like that :erm: Worked for America a long time ago ;_;

It's not as simple as that, over the years Britain populated Ireland with loyalist Scottish clans who are now here for many generations and rightfully citizens. The trouble is they still don't class themselves as Irish.

This massive step by the IRA was still not enough for unionism, as I suspected...whatyagonna do.

In regards to the IRA killing thousands of innocents, this is true in some respects, but they share that mantel with Loyalism & Britrish forces.

Now with the IRA done with violence it would probably be the right time for me to get my citizenship there :D When my Dad gets around to getting it then so will I(Grandfather was from Ireland)...or so I have been told :shifty:

britain had no choice but to negotiate with the ira after the mull of kintyre crash.

they lost all their intelligence in one go and suddenly had no defence against the ira. with that crash they effectively lost control and had no options left.and the ira compromised and have constantly stuck to the deal. once the good friday agreement was signed they dropped in actions. when disarmament was called for they did. and it was veified and checked. when the end to criminality was called for that too seems to have been done.

when it comes down to it they have been pretty good on their word. unlike the unionists.