I Told Ya... Stop Hittin' Tha Table!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lilliputian Hitcher
No, since there is apparently a rule on this forum that states that you don't have to.
EDIT:
Funnily enough, there also seems to be a rule against making R=U threads and talking about Pharoh Amon Khan. Whoops.
I wrote this spit a long time ago, a really long time ago! ROFL!!! I LOVE that song!!! Pretty much explains why I'm posting and what Lilliputian Hitcher said...
I'm not a 'bad guy' I'm just a famous 'bad boy'... :love:
Also, I gotta note, that just as I laid my head down to rest...
I realized I can't really lay down my beliefs on the mechanics of time on this game based on fantasy. And this just makes me think... who else other than the writers? I mean, really... I see it as the writers just used time travel and Time Compression as a (I don't know how to spell it properly (yeah I know it's the internet, but I'm lazy! Shove IT! LOL) Megafuffin Device.
"Hey, we don't HAVE understand time travel, but just use it as something that everyone just goes along with. Let's get on with the story"
My point is that I apologize that my views or anyone's views or 'facts' of the mechanics of time more than likely don't apply simply by the fact of this is fantasy and this was a story with one intended ending mapped out possibly without any facts or scientific intensions included other to be to exact other than what was the end result of the stories ending by the writers/creatorsOr not (scientific intensions)... which is inconclusive...
Just like "Time Compression" I've realized, this is futile... A major effort for entertainment or bending the law without breaking it, but ultimately futile... (and fun).
R=U is the result of an inconclusive story and will continue to be so... Just like the 'bible' that 'claims' to counter-act it.
I had more to say, but I editied it out for personal reasons....
I really do not understand why the R=U has caused such debate seeing that this is just mere fantasy to the result of there is an FAQ about it for the simple fact to bring about 'facts' to refute it; (and with respect Sir Bahamut you do not refute totally but offer perspectives on both sides to the best of your ability but at the same time it does seem to be biased against the possibility.)
Personally, see the possibilty as plausiable despite and equally the 'facts' that others 'find' to 'refute' as those to 'support' and therefore the futility as 'Time Compression' and the 'Fated Loop'...
Surely there is means of ameleration....