You don't have to if you don't want to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
Let's make it interesting next year:
Start:
2 QBs
5 WRs
3 RBs
2 TEs
2 Kickers
2 Defenses
That should really shake things up.
Printable View
You don't have to if you don't want to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
Let's make it interesting next year:
Start:
2 QBs
5 WRs
3 RBs
2 TEs
2 Kickers
2 Defenses
That should really shake things up.
Yeah, but I never know if Baltimore's going to put up -2 points or 20 points.Quote:
You don't have to if you don't want to.
especially with 12 or more teams, rsl.
Yeah, we'd be forced to start Joey Harrington and Alex Smith.
well Raist, your RB and TE matched my RB and TE. Now let's see if the rest of your team can match what I've just put up.
It's possible. I'll need a big game from Bledsoe, Johnson, and Jordan, though.
Dallas is going to have a tough time without Flozell Adams at left tackle, and Julius Jones is out too.
Dallas, run the ball? They never did anyway. :p
EDIT: though they're trying at the beginning of this game, and failing miserably. Just let Bledsoe throw!
I'll be out of town next week so maybe my absense and indifference to the games that weekend will result in a victory.
We actually ran the ball pretty well. It's Bledsoe being a FREAKING PIECE OF CRAP that cost us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
It was your idiot head coach who wanted to go for it with like 7 seconds left from the 50. Take a knee and go to OT instead of taking a chance of losing the game before you even get that shot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirobaito
EDIT: Ok, Parcells isn't an idiot, but that was a really really bad call.
well you still won despite Brees and McCardell outplaying Bledsoe and Johnson. Stupid freaking LaMont Jordan.
Go Raiders!
Gabriel was nice, but if he caught one more pass he would have been nicer.
He made some good grabs. Wish I could have said the same for Porter, that bum.