Then you are a homophobe.
Then you are a homophobe.
This would be the stupidest idea ever.
I think saying that a homosexual Bond would cause the franchise to lose 90% of its fanbase is a bit of an overreaction. I doubt it would such a high percentage, though I'm sure there would be a negative reaction from some fans of the books and films.
It'd be an interesting idea, but not one suited to the Bond series at all. Far too dramatic a change from a franchise that has thrived on general consistency in terms of what to expect from a Bond film.
Though having said that, we've already had an invisible car, so you never know.
Why are we even considering this a possibility based on this information?Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_20
Well, my little brother told me, but he probably read some parody and mistook it for real plans.Quote:
Originally Posted by kikimm
Anyway, I think this is so far from likely, that I'd say it's damn near impossible. Especially considering how much they've changed Bond's character in Casino Royale to match that of the books, I can't possibly imagine why they'd suddenly jump into the opposite direction. With how much of a success Casino Royale was, I can't see any drastic changes like that.
I heard Harry potter goes gay in the next book!
I'm not really sure I would care. It would be pretty funny. After all the years he's been seducing women and stuff, he turns out being gay. :D But it sucks that everyone wouldn't appreciate it happening all that much.
Oh, I don't see this one happening. The backlash would be too immense for such a thing.
On a side note, discriminating against homosexuals is called heterosexism, while having an irrational fear of or becoming a homosexual is homophobia. I know the term homophobe has simply grown to mean discrimination over the days, and thaz cool, but I have this odd urge to bring it up anyway because I was born with 3/2 of a brain (see what I mean).
I think that these rumors originated from this article.
Let's not blow the issue out of proportion.
Sure would be a interesting twist. I'd imagine everyone would go crazy if they actually did go ahead with this. Nah I don't think it would work
Bond is way too much of a lady's man to completely switch sides, if he did then it would go against his character. That being said, the only way I could see Bond having sex with another man was if it somehow became crucial to get something and the only way to do it was to have sex with some dude. Even then, I do not think a situation would arrive or they would have another agent go it or something.
It wouldn't be James Bond anymore, it'd be something completely different. Seriously. Every James bond has the same thing, ready?Quote:
Originally Posted by DK
"Well, anyway, I was reading this James Bond book, and right away I realized that like most books, it had too many words. The plot was the same one that all James Bond books have: An evil person tries to blow up the world, but James Bond kills him and his henchmen and makes love to several attractive women. There, that's it: 24 words."
It's taken from something else, but it says exactly what James Bond is. Making him gay, is no longer James Bond. That's a fact.
THE JACKEL
ha ha get a life a gay james bond!
That's a very insightful comment, chrisfffan. I salute you.
this would never ever happen
Weeeeeeell. That's pretty much exactly what happened to one of my mom's friends. He was gay, except his family was very opposed so he never came out, grew up, married a woman, had kids, then finally came out and has been with his boyfriend for some long amount of years now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_20My thoughts exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zora
It'd just be pathetic if Bond were to transform into some homosexual dude after FORTY YEARS!
*uh, I'm a gay, it seems, oh yeah... it took me forty years to figure it out, though, perhaps a bit slow...*