I would like to see a time travel movie that fixes the events of the third movie, but that will never happen.
Printable View
I would like to see a time travel movie that fixes the events of the third movie, but that will never happen.
Why would they want to do something like that? The last thing the world needs is another crappy x-men movie.
Well the third X-Men film sucks and doesn't Superman Returns disregard the events of Superman III & IV? And the fourth X-Men film wouldn't be called X-Men 4 I was just too lazy to write "The Next X-Men Movie" as my thread title.Quote:
Originally Posted by Breine
If they were to make a fourth movie that wouldn't work at all in my opinion. It would just seem ridiculous to not acknowledge the third movie.Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912
I think if they did, they'd could totally make it bad @$$ and dominate over that last spider man film!! It has so much potential, much like third one did.....
I believe it was stated around the release of the third film in the francise that, were another X-Men film released, it would be entirely seperate from the first three films, as that series of storylines is done. I can't find a source for this and I might be making it up though.
Wolverine and Magneto are getting their own films though. And a third spin-off is in the works as well. superherohype.com has some news about that somewhere on the site, it may be the Mystique film that was talked about awhile back
When I saw this thread on the homepage I thought it would of been made by John_912. Isnt that odd?
Anyways, X-Men 4 will only work if it has a good cast and a good director. X-Men 3 sucked because Bryan Singer left the series to do Superman.
Oh, okay. Now I see where you are coming from - because, well... let's just be honest... the third X-Men movie didn't really deliver.Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912Well the third X-Men film sucks and doesn't Superman Returns disregard the events of Superman III & IV? And the fourth X-Men film wouldn't be called X-Men 4 I was just too lazy to write "The Next X-Men Movie" as my thread title.Quote:
Originally Posted by BreineIf they were to make a fourth movie that wouldn't work at all in my opinion. It would just seem ridiculous to not acknowledge the third movie.Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912
I'm not sure about the Superman films, though, but with Superman Returns I guess they started a new Superman movie franchise.
Superman Returns did ignore Superman III and IV, and only kept select bits of Superman II (I read somewhere that in that movies continuity, Zod and friends were never released, but I never saw anything official saying what they kept from Superman II. I'd really rather think that they just ignored most of it too).Quote:
Originally Posted by BreineOh, okay. Now I see where you are coming from - because, well... let's just be honest... the third X-Men movie didn't really deliver.Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912Well the third X-Men film sucks and doesn't Superman Returns disregard the events of Superman III & IV? And the fourth X-Men film wouldn't be called X-Men 4 I was just too lazy to write "The Next X-Men Movie" as my thread title.Quote:
Originally Posted by BreineIf they were to make a fourth movie that wouldn't work at all in my opinion. It would just seem ridiculous to not acknowledge the third movie.Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912
I'm not sure about the Superman films, though, but with Superman Returns I guess they started a new Superman movie franchise.
I don't think that'd really work for the X-Men franchise though. Unlike Superman III and IV, a lot of people actually saw X3. Not to mention the amount of time there was between the last two Superman movies gave Singer some wiggle room to do almost anything he wanted with the franchise. As much as I'd like them to ignore X3, it'd be a hard pill for the studio to swallow. It'd basically be acknowledging that it was crap and they're trying for a do-over.