Printable View
RAWH. I AM ON THE OFFENSIVE BECAUSE DREDDZ SAID A SMALL, SLIGHTLY OFFENSIVE COMMENT THAT I PERCEIVED TO BE HIM BEING ON THE OFFENSIVE WHEN IN TRUTH IT WAS NOTHING AT ALL, AND I'D LIKELY BE BETTER OFF IGNORING SAID COMMENT. RAWH.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raebus
:monster:
I agree with Dreddz. The whole point of E3 is that big games are unveiled :monster:
RAWH. I AM IN AGREEMENT YET DREDDZ SAW THE THREAD TITLE AND COULD HAVE NOT POSTED A COMMENT WHICH WAS BOUND TO GET ATTENTION. RAWHQuote:
Originally Posted by KentarouRAWH. I AM ON THE OFFENSIVE BECAUSE DREDDZ SAID A SMALL, SLIGHTLY OFFENSIVE COMMENT THAT I PERCEIVED TO BE HIM BEING ON THE OFFENSIVE WHEN IN TRUTH IT WAS NOTHING AT ALL, AND I'D LIKELY BE BETTER OFF IGNORING SAID COMMENT. RAWH.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raebus
:monster:
I agree with dreddz, raebus, kentarou, manus, and raebus again. xP
RAWH. CAN'T DISAGREE THERE. RAWH.Quote:
Originally Posted by RaebusRAWH. I AM IN AGREEMENT YET DREDDZ SAW THE THREAD TITLE AND COULD HAVE NOT POSTED A COMMENT WHICH WAS BOUND TO GET ATTENTION. RAWHQuote:
Originally Posted by KentarouRAWH. I AM ON THE OFFENSIVE BECAUSE DREDDZ SAID A SMALL, SLIGHTLY OFFENSIVE COMMENT THAT I PERCEIVED TO BE HIM BEING ON THE OFFENSIVE WHEN IN TRUTH IT WAS NOTHING AT ALL, AND I'D LIKELY BE BETTER OFF IGNORING SAID COMMENT. RAWH.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raebus
:monster:
Thread is now full of fail and AIDS. Way to go, guys.
In case you're wondering, the "fail" Manus speaks of is the RAWH-ers. The "AIDS" is Manus himself.
That isn't a jab at the RAWH-ers, though. I just really wanted to say Manus has AIDS.
I won't be getting a wii anytime soon, or for the next few years for that matter, but I would like them to make the full-fledged next installment in the main Mario series, as all we've seen since Mario 64 have been spinoffs and odd tales of custodial mishap.
... Super Mario Galaxy came out like a few months ago. >_>
Mario has always been about custodial mishaps. What are you talking about?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolivar
Um, I thought it was obvious from my word choice... When I said "full fledged" I meant the next in the line of:
Super Mario Bros. -> SMB2 -> SMB3 -> Super Mario World -> Mario 64 -> new mario game.
I'm talkin about classic mario, not travelling through space, and definately not switching career choices from a plumber to a janitor (hence custodial).
Both Super Mario Sunshine and Super Mario Galaxy follow the exact same gameplay formula of Mario 64. >_>
Oh well, Super Mario Galaxy is still a brilliant game.
*sigh* never mind...
So because Mario Galaxy isn't the exact same thing as Super Mario 64, it's not a full-fledged Mario game?