Why do so many people think that "IIII" was a mistake?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mercen-X

I like IIII better in representing 4 since IV could be mistaken as "InterVenous"...

---

It's IntraVenously, and seriously, who would put that on a clock? :p

That Japanese minigame was prob taken out due to the enormous amount of time it would take to do it.

---

It doesn't take THAT long to do it...it was prob taken out because someone said "hey westerners won't like using their brain or getting frustrated" VII is afterall too easy.

Hopefully a guy I know can place it back as I think taking away a minigame like that kinda lessens the game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mercen-X

I like IIII better in representing 4 since IV could be mistaken as "InterVenous"...

---

It's IntraVenously, and seriously, who would put that on a clock?

---

:screwy::objection:First:cool: Second:confused: Next:cry: Then:p Finally:thumb: :smug:

I recall a debate about how VIII could have been IIX or something of the sort once. As I thought then, who cares? We all get the idea.