Originally Posted by
ljkkjlcm9
I don't see her as being sub-servient. She is a Bounty Hunter, responding to a distress beacon where they were already on board taking care of the issue. She either had the choice to leave, or stay and work for him. If your boss tells you not to do something, or use something, you don't use it. In essence, she has a "contract" with him, and he is her "employer" at the time. It's like if you have a school project and your teacher says, build X something, but don't use glue or tape. Then after an hour of people struggling, she says, ok now tape, then an hour later, ok glue. It makes sense to me, and I think people are reading way too far into it. If it was a guy under contract with another guy, they probably wouldn't be complaining about it in nearly the same manner, if at all.
THE JACKEL