I'm bored

I like the idea of PMing the members, especially if they have a sig with some hefty HTML code like tables and links, etc. If the member doesn't know much HTML it'd probably take them a while to code it back. - Jenova·Rebirth

I save a copy of every signature before I delete it, but I guess I should start signing my name after every sig that I delete so that people will know that they have to talk to me about it if they wish to have it back and not to another CK or Admin that doesn't have it.

To solve that we could just comment out the sig rather than deleting it outright. - Super Delete

This, again, is a waste of time because it ends up being something that is different than what was intended so it gets changed again anyways. I do sometimes go in and decrease the size of text so that the sig will fall within the limits, but I do this only when I have nothing better to do at the time.

btw is my sig ok *Is worried now*

Yes, Baloki. Your sig is fine. :cat:

Er, I meant putting <!-- --> around the sig so that the the code is still there, but it doesn't show up on the screen. I don't see how that takes more than a couple extra seconds. That way in the edit sig box they still see their work and can tinker around with it, but when they make a post it only shows the warning.

Oh! Okay, that's not a bad idea. :)

OR people could just read the rules and we wouldn't have to do any of that at all. :p

or we could disable signatures :D

No! :eek: ...but I do like Matty Pie!'s suggestion best. Commenting out some sigs might be okay in some circumstances, but really, just read the rules and follow them. It's really simple! :) I know some of these sigs take a lot of work to put together and I don't like it when I have to remove all of that work, but the quidelines are there right beside the sig field...you can't miss them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eestlinc

or we could disable signatures :D

---

No! :eek:

I'm with Leeza, quite a good number of sigs here are great and we should keep on letting people use them :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Leeza

No! :eek: ...but I do like Matty Pie!'s suggestion best. Commenting out some sigs might be okay in some circumstances, but really, just read the rules and follow them. It's really simple! :) I know some of these sigs take a lot of work to put together and I don't like it when I have to remove all of that work, but the quidelines are there right beside the sig field...you can't miss them.

---

Just saying my opinion. :( It's like whenever I voice my opinion, I get slammed... though not really, but in a way, yes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agent Proto

Just saying my opinion. :( It's like whenever I voice my opinion, I get slammed... though not really, but in a way, yes.

---

I don't think your opinion is really getting slammed just debated, the only real people ignoring the topic and just posting for the sake of it seem to be the people saying, Just get rid of the sigs, and although I like your idea Proto I don't think they'd do it because it could potentially be a lot of work and the system could be abused quite badly...

Yeah, I think I've mentioned commenting out the sig at #eoff a few times, but Arche never pays attention to me except when I provide him with cheap sex. Actually, he never really pays attention to me when I do that.

Comment it out. I suck at coding, and it took me about 20 minutes to fix it the one time I've violated it. (which someone said it was my second time...I still don't know what the first time was)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirobaito

Arche never pays attention to me except when I provide him with cheap sex. Actually, he never really pays attention to me when I do that.

---

I didn't think Archie would need to pay for sex with you? Is the wedding off :cry: ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kirobaito

Comment it out.

---

Here, Here!