*Votes* Can we say who we voted for??
Printable View
*Votes* Can we say who we voted for??
I don't want votes to be based on popular opinion.
i.e. someone seeing the "cool people" voted for Jimbob-Mcspanky-Pants so zounds of people vote for the same person
Dr Unne is not in this round, therefore the winner is of little consequence. *doesn't vote*
Without pics I voted for person with the sexiest name.
How can you have 'hottest' member without pics? That's madness, it isn't 'hottest' then it would be 'charismatic' or 'popular'. If someone can win 'Hottest' member without a pic the competition is severely mis-advertised in my opinion.
Sexiness is based on far more than appearence. :greenie:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuchulainn
Can I vote for Jimbob-Mcspanky-Pants? Pleeeease?
Sexiness entails more than physical attraction. The idea of this contest has been explained many times.
I was wondering when this thing was ever going to get started. :P
Well i know im still not gonna win *sigh* well i voted and im pleased good luck to all!! *gives all a big hug*..xXx...
So does only one person advance from each of these four groups? Or do the top two or three vote getters for each group advance until we get to a final pairing?
Take care all.
Can you vote even if your in this round? *waits to vote*
That's what I was thinking. You know what they say about great minds..Quote:
Originally Posted by The Captain
I think so... that's generally how competitions of sexiness are judged. Oh, whatever, HOTNESS.
I voted.
I'd agree attraction entails more than JUST looks, but it still needs to involve everything. If it was a combination then yes, but someone w/o a pic getting voted 'hottest member' is just crazy as some random person who you've never seen before showing a picture & never posting. Like I said I believe that's a dumb rule, hottest does indeed involve personality aswell as looks, but I don't believe you can vote on one without the other, but I'm not in it & I'm not voting so I'll just leave it at that.
It's a fun competition on an internet forum. It's not the Olympics. Who cares about the specific details of this that and the other?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuchulainn
Fair point, although the same could be said about the Hall of Fame/Infamy Committee but has not stopped heated & details rule discussions that are a lot more pedant than mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychotic