Jamie Star won the internets. xDDDD
PS: I don't get any #eoff stuff. Chat logs confuzzle me.
Printable View
Jamie Star won the internets. xDDDD
PS: I don't get any #eoff stuff. Chat logs confuzzle me.
Jamie Stars picture has nothing to do with the topic. He loses.
Never a truer statement has been spoken.Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottNUMBERS
Of course, that means Marick is completely wrong.
God I hate the EOFF channel.
.opt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Manus
Woow. Old Manesus!
But still not God.
That's a shame.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rye
I am the true vine.
One for the vine.
I'm pretty sure a revelation has to come with some kind of reasoning.
I couldn't find a picture of GodQuote:
Originally Posted by Chemical
I'm pretty sure that most revelations have no reasonings. Also, Old Manus, that picture is definitely Godly, as it bestows you as the Son of the Trinity.
Do a Google for "Sistine Chapel"Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Manus
Actually. Here
http://www.bioeng.auckland.ac.nz/inf...ine_chapel.jpg
The right one's God.
This image is clearly based on the Occidental version of God, but most religious art, connected with christianity, comes from the European Renaissance.
(before the renaissance they didn't have oils/canvas/linear perspective and only did crappy frescoes unworthy of being mentioned because they never employed the cool technologies of realism that budded during the renaizsance and international humanism era.... and the baroque images are all very... simple and usually lack God because of the church being scrutinized for semony and the sales of indulgences as well as being too iconical... cue the Prodestant Reformation...so yea.)
Conclusion;
Do a google for: God + Rennaisance
Wow, god really knows how to throw a great party.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chemical
...right
So does this make me an Apostle?
