I would go with Rage and Soundgarden ... i can't stand audioslave ... don't know why, i just see red when i hear their music >.<
Printable View
I would go with Rage and Soundgarden ... i can't stand audioslave ... don't know why, i just see red when i hear their music >.<
The lead singer of RATM has the most annoying voice in the world. And I dont know of Audioslave.
So neither.
flippin Rage are flippin awesome!!!
Audioslave never stood naked with duct tape on their faces and giant letters drawn on their torso's in front of thousands of people expecting them to play now did they?
Rage Against The Machine! They're the ones who freakin blew as many people off as they could. Like that PMRC stunt wich maxx explained. And their music is better.
Rage all the way.
RATM, but mostly because I'm an old nostalgic fart.
sooooo...that's a good thing? If audioslave did that they would be a better band?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxx Power
Twice as good in fact...Quote:
Originally Posted by farplaner
Rage - plain and simple, Rage Against the Machine is by far the better of the two.
Hmmmm....you learn something new every day. However, I think this supports the argument that learning isn't always a constructive activity... :tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shine On...Twice as good in fact...Quote:
Originally Posted by farplaner
Gunther and the Sunshine Girls > Both.
I loved RATM, I dearly miss them
I've hated both. Though I never knew there was a corrolation. Not that that has anything to do with why I hate them. And yes, Zack had the most annoying voice. He argued more than he sang. And you could tell he was spitting the whole time. And I'm not a big fan of Soundgarden since we seem to be on that subject. There's better alternative music out there. There's better rock. And there's better ballads. All three bands are horribly below average in my music collection (which they aren't a part of. Once a month on the radio is more than enough for me)
rage owns audioslave :P although audioslave are pretty good rage ftw