:lol: This forum delights me.Quote:
Originally Posted by roto13-ness
As for the letter thing, I think you'll be happier if you just play the game and don't study it quite so much.
Printable View
:lol: This forum delights me.Quote:
Originally Posted by roto13-ness
As for the letter thing, I think you'll be happier if you just play the game and don't study it quite so much.
I think not.Itīs more fun to study it.Adds replayability.
With any assortment of letters, damn high. It's all about choosing the right words. You have merely changed these letters and chosen these words to CREATE a message.Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Esthar
The letter number sequence does not have to have a 'hidden meaning'. Did it ever occur to you that it is simply relevant to the current situation, that of Ragnarok's reentry? Oi.
The Ragnarok is a Time Machine.
The time travelling engine of Balamb Garden is located on the MD level(It is the clock tower on Ultiīs castle).
JME is related with time travel.
In order to reenter atmosphere one has to set the era where it will land.
That was what was done.The number in the middle represents an era.
The words were probably keywords to activate the time-travel engine.
You have shown no evidence for this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Esthar
You have shown no evidence of Balamb Time Travelling, or it being Ulti's castle.Quote:
The time travelling engine of Balamb Garden is located on the MD level(It is the clock tower on Ultiīs castle).
You say this like it is a revelation.Quote:
JME is related with time travel.
Only in your WOTC conspiracy, which you HAVE YET TO PROVE.Quote:
In order to reenter atmosphere one has to set the era where it will land.
Or it was simply a reentry vector, and no time travel was involved.Quote:
That was what was done.The number in the middle represents an era.
The words were probably keywords to activate the time-travel engine.
My theories are only based on the relationships between concepts,not on empirical evidence.
If the relationship donīt generate internal inconsistencies it can be considered valid.In real life this would not work but this is a game.
My theories proved to be valid because I keep adding to it based on stipulations from the game and there is no way you find inconsistencies.Either internal or game based.And I have millions of theories.
Congratulations, concession accepted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Esthar
It doesn't work that way ANYWHERE, and you can't special plead that it can.Quote:
If the relationship donīt generate internal inconsistencies it can be considered valid.In real life this would not work but this is a game.
They have NOT proved to be valid because you keep adding terms to ensure infalsifiability, BOTH of which are HORRIBLE no-no's when dealing with theories.Quote:
My theories proved to be valid because I keep adding to it based on stipulations from the game and there is no way you find inconsistencies.Either internal or game based.And I have millions of theories.
And no, you have millions of POSTULATES. What you have does not, and never will deserve to be called a theory, especially since you openly admit you have no empirical evidence.
Itīs the only thing you can do with a game anyway.
W is for Witches.
Like, Succession of Witches, and stuff.
Ryushikaze, you weren't here for FE's previous threads. Most of which reached like 20 pages long. He's proven all of this before. I suggest you go dig them up for some reading or something.
...Not that I really agree with FE, but still.
Actually, I was here for his previous threads, and I did do my research. He's STILL spouting bovine feces.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaven
And No, FE, you can ALSO use the rational method, backed up with statements by the production staff. You are doing neither.
Just because you can make this an acronym, doesn't mean that it is an acronym, or, if it is, that it is the one you think. There are literally hundreds of words in the English language that any one of those letters could stand for. There is absolutely no evidence supporting your interpretation, so once again we must accept what the game told us as fact. That the numbers were merely a coordinate system that determined landing vectors.
This can either be FE making up stuff, or FE discovering everything Square had hidden. :shifty:
You are so awesome Future Esthar. :bigsmile:
Actually, even if those letters were an acronym, the chances that Future Esthar is 100% correct in its interpretation are beyond the six sigma point of probability.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocket Edge