I knew what you meant. I was commenting on Evol's idea.
But any single-digit system for years would become ambiguous beyond a ten-year span.
Printable View
I knew what you meant. I was commenting on Evol's idea.
But any single-digit system for years would become ambiguous beyond a ten-year span.
Agreed. Hence my assumptions.
What?! are you serious?????Quote:
Originally Posted by Magus of Zeal
You mean I've been fighting annoying battles for all these years whenever I get to this point and I dont need to?!
If memory serves, you have to fight your way down to the bottom of the Deep Sea Deposit (even with Enc-None), and the random encounters in the DSD disappear if you defeat Ultima Weapon.
And I thought Zell just lets you take a different path down the DSRC.
What about 3015 Found a strong energy field?Year 3, Day 015?Quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense, if we're bringing years into it, to arrange it as YDDD? IE: Year 4, Day 242
Actually if you put the right code you dont need to fight monsters on your way down.I dont remember the code right now.Quote:
If memory serves, you have to fight your way down to the bottom of the Deep Sea Deposit (even with Enc-None), and the random encounters in the DSD disappear if you defeat Ultima Weapon.And I thought Zell just lets you take a different path down the DSRC.
Yes. That is exactly how it would be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Evol
Your idea is inconsistent,it could also mean YYDD or YYYD.
Yes, it COULD mean either of those, but neither of those gives an accurate count of the day of the year, and makes them worthless as counting tools. However, how, exactly, is YDDD inconsistent?Quote:
Originally Posted by Evol
I mean your idea can be alterable.
And? How is this a worthwhile criticism of any of the three possible dating methods I have espoused? Your method is equally alterable, but also suffers the burden of not being incredibly, I mean incredibly unwieldy.
So you dont like someone criticized you?Quote:
And? How is this a worthwhile criticism of any of the three possible dating methods I have espoused?
Same with you.Quote:
Your method is equally alterable, but also suffers the burden of not being incredibly, I mean incredibly unwieldy
I think there used to be a city in DSRF.
No, I don't like when people try and criticize me without leg one to stand on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Evol
Same with you.[/quote]Quote:
Your method is equally alterable, but also suffers the burden of not being incredibly, I mean incredibly unwieldy
At WORST, one of my three suffers from being unwieldy, and that's only if you assume we can't add digits to the front.
Facility? Unlikely. Deposit? Possibly. Not like it's impossible, what with all the Lunar cries throughout time.Quote:
I think there used to be a city in DSRF.
call FE lol.
You have to open-minded when someone criticize you.Quote:
No, I don't like when people try and criticize me without leg one to stand on.
For example you often criticize people without mercy.
You want someone apologizes to you when he/she insulted you but in other hand you never say sorry to the person you have insulted.
We can assume anything if it comes to a theory.Quote:
At WORST, one of my three suffers from being unwieldy, and that's only if you assume we can't add digits to the front.
There's many old structures in DSRF.Quote:
Facility? Unlikely. Deposit? Possibly. Not like it's impossible, what with all the Lunar cries throughout time.
The structures existed before those DSRF people discovered it.
Maybe Lunar Cry is an issue here but how can you prove it.
Ryushikaze is actually using a valid application of the scientific method to evaluate this game:
1) If someone makes an unusual claim, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim. It's not of the job of the people hearing the claim to disprove it.
2) Many explainations for events are possible, but simpler explanations are more likely. That's known as Occam's Razor.
3) Valid evidence would include events from the game itself, an official book (like Ultimania), or creator interviews.
Speculating on ideas that are based on other sources can be fun, but are ultimately unproveable. However, some ideas are more likely than others.