Eagles baby, that's all it's about.
Printable View
Eagles baby, that's all it's about.
he's had a couple good games, yes he's had several horrid games, but seattle lost to san fran so they suck and should not even be in the playoffs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
Did you not see Grossman in the thirteen weeks since then?Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Took the Red Pill
Prepare to make that 2 playoff losses.Quote:
Originally Posted by ffxatticus
Chicago lost to Miami and Green Bay.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^he's had a couple good games, yes he's had several horrid games, but seattle lost to san fran so they suck and should not even be in the playoffs.Quote:
Originally Posted by RaistlinDid you not see Grossman in the thirteen weeks since then?Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^
My point is, I think Seattle will play better in the playoffs than they so far have. And I see no reason to believe Chicago will, because their offense really really sucks. Playoff teams are not like Arizona, where you can turn the ball over 35209435 times and not score at all offensively and still pull off a win. Although it is the NFC where no team has played really consistently (except arguably the Eagles in the last half of the season), so Chicago still has a shot.
Either the Eagles or Seattle will lose to San Diego or Baltimore. If I had to pick two I'd say San Diego over Philadelphia.
Or the Eagles will win :D
the green bay game really meant nothing, why would chicago play all out for nothing? not like they were going to go undefeated or something. but still san fran sucks and seattle lost to them, that's no worse then losing to miami who beats good teams but plays for :skull::skull::skull::skull: against :skull::skull::skull::skull:ty teams.Quote:
Originally Posted by RaistlinChicago lost to Miami and Green Bay.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^he's had a couple good games, yes he's had several horrid games, but seattle lost to san fran so they suck and should not even be in the playoffs.Quote:
Originally Posted by RaistlinDid you not see Grossman in the thirteen weeks since then?Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^
My point is, I think Seattle will play better in the playoffs than they so far have. And I see no reason to believe Chicago will, because their offense really really sucks. Playoff teams are not like Arizona, where you can turn the ball over 35209435 times and not score at all offensively and still pull off a win. Although it is the NFC where no team has played really consistently (except arguably the Eagles in the last half of the season), so Chicago still has a shot.
Here's what I have to say about the Bears' chances in the Playoffs:Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^
http://sjl-static12.sjl.youtube.com/...7BYOnDrM/3.jpg
PLAYOFFS?! Don't talk about PLAYOFFS! Are you kidding me?! PLAYOFFS?! I just hope we can win a game!
Can I just say, in the redzone, Patriots are #1 in defense and #2 in offense in the league. Whoever says they aren't strong is kidding themselves.
Plus they'll be getting a number of their hurt players back... the Patriots will at least have great games as far as they go.
BTW, the Colts are going to get run all over by the Chiefs. I honestly think they have no chance.
Giants suck, they're going nowhere.
I had high hopes for the cowboys for one reason, the replacement of Drew Bledsoe leading the team to victory. Tom Brady did it, and I SOOOO wanted Romo to do it. Bledsoe is an overrated sack of crap who never deserved to be anywhere. He has a super bowl ring though... too bad Brady won it for him.
My best bet is....
Chiefs win
Pats win
Eagles win
Seatle vs Dallas is the toughest choice... Seatle sadly
as for superbowl...
New Orleans vs... idk AFC teams are a lot better, especially in recent years
THE JACKEL
THE JACKEL
Bledsoe was fortunate enough to be associated with the Patriots becoming a perennial playoff contender to begin with. Seeing as how he got sacked a lot and threw a lot of interceptions in recent years, leads me to believe that the only reason he was ever great in New England is because of his offensive line.Quote:
Originally Posted by ljkkjlcm9
Bledsoe may have a Super Bowl ring; but the fact of the matter is, the only time he ever tried to win one on his own, he was severely beaten by the team I like to call the "Cheeseheads".
Speaking of Romo and Bledsoe, I found this hilarious spoof site that's allegedly Drew Bledsoe's blog. It's not really Bledsoe's blog, though, but it's hilarious nonetheless.
Because teams always try to win. Detroit won their last game which in turn means they no longer have the top draft pick. Same with San Fran. Just because you are have a guaranteed A going into the final exam doesn't mean you don't try and turn in an F exam because it doesn't matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrowaBartonIV ^_^
And Chicago was desperately trying to put something together to give their offense some confidence going into the playoffs. I saw their starters on the field - well, until Grossman was pulled for sucking. He should've been pulled weeks ago.
This is what I call "irrational home bias." You're still an amateur though; I suggest you talk to Kirobaito. San Francisco had a better record than Detroit or Miami - the two losing teams which Chicago lost to at home. Losing to Arizona is inexcusable, but then, Chicago was a last-second missed field goal from doing the same (and definitely didn't deserve the win).Quote:
but still san fran sucks and seattle lost to them, that's no worse then losing to miami who beats good teams but plays for against ty teams.
Which turns to the question: WHY DO WE PLAY FOOTBALL?!Quote:
Originally Posted by edczxcvbnm
The answer:
http://www.cbc.ca/gfx/topstory/sport...herman0108.jpg
"YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME!"
Speaking of the man above, his playoff record states that he's undefeated against head coaches he has previously worked for, and winless against those he has not. His playoff winless streak against coaches he has not worked for may be snapped, given Indy's 32nd-ranked Run defense (and as we all know, there's only 32 flavors in the NFL).
Oh :skull::skull::skull::skull:. When I said san fran above I meant the Raiders but they lost. I got them confused because san fran has sucked pretty bad the last few years as well >_<
I agree with his insane comments(the jets coach above) but sometimes people need to be reminded of that because they believe teams lay down because a game doesn't matter or you will get a better draft pick if you lose.
There are very few teams that I can recall have actually laid down and let the other team win...and it cost them big time. Most recent example is Indy last year. 14-0 and then they pretty much rested their starters for4 weeks and expected them to perform like the other 14 wins in the playoffs. NO! Not even close.