Talk about old news.
An iPod box was used to disperse the smoke when they were filming. The Apple logo from the box shows through as the PS3 didn't completely cover the logo in a few frames.
Printable View
Talk about old news.
An iPod box was used to disperse the smoke when they were filming. The Apple logo from the box shows through as the PS3 didn't completely cover the logo in a few frames.
Actually, I just did a bit of research and the reason is because Sony used Apples program Shake to make the flash. There was obviously some mistake made whilst making the flash. They've gotten rid of that flash as far as I know.
PS3 the best!
Spoken like a true fanboy! :)
I'm not sure weather it'll be worth getting or not. I mean, it'll have some really great games (FF XIII namely), but dear Lord is it expensive!
It's really not that expensive when you take a closer look at it. I mean, what they're putting into the system aside from BluRay makes it a heavy tech system capable of a lot of things. I've seen cameras that are more expensive.
For a game system, it certainly is more expensive than what we've been seeing normally. For a mainstream media entertainment device though, it is surely out of its 'proce bracket'. People who buy thousand dollar cameras are not 'mainstream', they know what they're getting for the price. Sony is trying to market this thing as a high-end device (which it is), and even told people to 'save your money' so you could afford one.
I'm certainly going to get one, but most likely not this year. Once more games that I actually want for it come out (mostly established franchises) then I'll consider it, otherwise i'll be happy with my currently owned systems and the Wii.
Conversely, if Zone of the Enders 3 happens to show its face, I WILL be all over that. In a heartbeat.
Its a bargin for what your getting, but its too expensive for what people want.
Dreddz knows it. They're pushing technology only a minority wants onto everyone. I know I don't care about 1080p :p. Maybe I would in 5 years, but then there's a new console out anyway.
What gave the consoles an edge earlier was the much lower resolution needed for TV screens. Now that they need to push almost as high resolutions as PCs, the price increases too.
And blu-ray. They say game developers want more space, use dual-layer discs. SO3 came on two single-layer DVDs after all, not two dual layer DVDs (though that's because two single layer discs are cheaper than one dual layer).
that controller.. OoO0o0OoO00OOoHHHHhhHH! i just wanna grab it and start playing.. lol!
its 6,000 kroners in denmark.. thank god im gonna get a job and 4,500 of my mother heheheheh ps3 here i come!
I'm still trying to save for a PS3 (with a $12/hr, 8r job its no sweat) but I went to a Bungie forum site...and you would beleave the hatred toward Sony :(
I'm hoping to wait for PS3 but should I get my hands on a 360 aswell? afterall I got an xbox now and have a few games for it.
HD Quality E3 videos
You may have seen the videos before, perhaps even in high quality. I know I haven't seen any clean HD videos from E3. All the ones I've seen have had 'gamevideos.com' or 'ign' or whatever site's watermarks. No watermarks on these!
In two years, or there abouts, every tv station in the US will have to switch to HD, so for 3 years people would be playing 640i games on their 1080i or 1080p TVs they bought to not get left behind.
I wouldn't call that an edge, I'd rather play a PC port with a higher resolution than a low res console version of the same game.
a dual layer disk = 8.7GB? Or something like that.
a single layer blu-ray = 25GB
Not exactly the same thing.
They won't need to use all that space at first, just like the first PS2 games didn't use all the DVD space, but now like you said there's games with 2 disks.
Roughly $1200 down here in NZ, it's quite a bit but it's not super expensive i'm gonna be getting on Nov 17