http://www.metacritic.com/games/plat...0Fantasy%20X-2
FFX-2 is not considered a bad game by most people.
Printable View
http://www.metacritic.com/games/plat...0Fantasy%20X-2
FFX-2 is not considered a bad game by most people.
I'm just going to post a new "rule" or at least guideline.
If it received over a 6 on a 10 point scale, or 3 on a 5 point scale, then it doesn't belong here. I would've stated Mystic Heroes before, but IGN gave it a 6, and the readers gave it a 7, but by the games you all are saying, it's rated as complete crap. I mean FFX-2 was an 8, Pokemon was an 8 as well, at least. And I lol at Halo 2.
I also enjoyed Mega Man 64, and the later Battle Network games which are considered bad compared to the older ones.
THE JACKEL
Who cares what a big corporation that was probaly paid off by SE to fabricate the lies that FFX-2 isn't a bad game....Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF
I really wasn't into it in my personal opinion. It was too pop culturish. Superficial, and really pretty much all I stand against in life...
Check out the user rating. 8.0 out of 10.0. Nobody was "paid off." There are just a lot of people who care about gameplay more than story.
http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/562386.asp
Wow man you can't take a conspiracy joke?Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
lol..
I hated its story, but I liked how you can set the jobs for every character you have. Like Yuna doesn't have to be the healer...
Me neither, it was impossible.Quote:
Originally Posted by ljkkjlcm9God that game was annoying, but I did enjoy it. Though I never got close to beating it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Traffic
Mega Man Xtreme for the Game Boy Color. I smurfing LOVED that game.
Hell no! Morrowind is boring like hell, worst RPG ever in my books, even not RPG, some boring exploring-bad combat game. In my books, no story, no characters with personality - no RPG game, period, no discussion here. Yes, Morrowind doesn't hold your hand or whatever else, it just doesn't hold, lol. If you like wandering through 1000 exactly the same maps and fighting 50000 exactly the same NPCs than so called PC RPG games are for you, Morrowind being worst of them. Idea that RPG can have open end is sick! The good story has to have a very great end. RPG can't give you freedom to do whatever you want, that's other games which have such option. I would write more what's RPG is about that's not a place.Quote:
Originally Posted by nozkitsYou just opened up a whole can of worms.. YOu like linear gameplay because last time I checked Morrowind wasn't a bad game.. You just want a video game that holds your hand through each little step, and detail... Sorry buddy Morrowind doesn't hold anyone's hands.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeL Valentine
Back on topic, I will go with MMORPG, it's Runescape, I know it's not a good game, I still play it time to time, I have no idea why :tongue:
>>> FF Mystic Quest.
I can't think of any really bad games I like, just some that are not well regarded.
Quake 1 single player- It's got a paper-thin plot that was added after the game was complete, it's thematically incoherent, and the weapons and items were mostly imported from Doom, but I liked it a lot anyway. I preferred it to Duke Nukem 3D single player, which was generally regarded as superior.
Doom 3- Not considered to be bad, but overly simplistic and retro (funny, DQ 8 gets praise for the same reasons). Perhaps it's just the fact that I hadn't played any FPSs for years prior to playing D3, but I liked its highly polished old-school style. I enjoyed it more than Half-Life 2, though I think that HL2 is "objectively" better.
I own Half life 2 (on xbox) and it kinda sux. I played it on PC and was marveled by the difference of how much better it was. Simply Xbox ports of PC games are total CRAP!
That tends to be the general rule for most PC > console ports. And vice versa.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yu-Yevon
I think this thread has been titled wrong.
they are not bad if the person likes it.
I could argue over the semantics of RPG history a lot, but basically it's styled after the more deep American-style RPG. JRPGs don't require nearly the same amount of patience, nor do they offer quite the same reward for the time spent.Quote:
Originally Posted by CloudySky
Quote:
Originally Posted by HsuI could argue over the semantics of RPG history a lot, but basically it's styled after the more deep American-style RPG. JRPGs don't require nearly the same amount of patience, nor do they offer quite the same reward for the time spent.Quote:
Originally Posted by CloudySky
I wouldn't call amarican rpg's "rewarding"