You may see London and France... but not underpants

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by licence

Quote:

---

Toplessness FTL!!!! So, if a man of 25 brushed past you an swiped all his chest sweat on you, you wouldn't mind because he's under 40?

---

Hmmm, I was thinking more of female toplessness.

---

I mentioned male toplessness, because in England it's illegal for women to walk around topless in public already, an that's where I live. That law in itself is stupid though, because if it's a matter of breasts being considered indecent, then that should mean flat chested women should be allowed to stroll around topless, and manboobed men should have to keep their tops on. An if women have to put up with wearing a top even if they'd prefer to take it off, men should have to do the same. An before anyone suggests we make it legal for women to all go topless too. A: Think of ugly women topless an you'll realise it's a bad idea an B: You're a sick pervert an I hate you.

I don't see anything wrong with people going topless, not a pervy thing or anything like that. Just never really bothered me. I think there are more important things to be worried about than if there is cloth covering nipples or not. Or in this case, jeans covering underwear.

Don't hate me Anaisa...pweeese.

Ive started getting into this habbit where I get pants that fit, but I guess my old fashioned thinking isnt popular with those damn youngsters

But anyway it'll probably phase out when they have children (If they do) and the kids are like, i dont want to be anything like my parents, and they'll wear their pants all the way up :)

yeah well pants are overrated so i think that law is dumb

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by licence

I don't see anything wrong with people going topless, not a pervy thing or anything like that. Just never really bothered me. I think there are more important things to be worried about than if there is cloth covering nipples or not. Or in this case, jeans covering underwear.

Don't hate me Anaisa...pweeese.

---

But what would be so wrong about people not going topless or purposely flashing their underwear?

I'll like you if you don't be a pervert. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anaisa

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by licence

I don't see anything wrong with people going topless, not a pervy thing or anything like that. Just never really bothered me. I think there are more important things to be worried about than if there is cloth covering nipples or not. Or in this case, jeans covering underwear.

Don't hate me Anaisa...pweeese.

---

But what would be so wrong about people not going topless or purposely flashing their underwear?

I'll like you if you don't be a pervert. :)

---

Well point taken, and an argument in this won't get very far so I'll stop now. I won't be a pervert either :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shiny

Good. I'm tired of seeing tacky boys with their butts and undies hanging out. It's a stupid trend and I can't wait till it ends.

---

I think it's dumb as well, but if I thought everything dumb deserved official response, well...:(

What happens if you wear your underwear over your bottoms then like a superhero? :p

What if you're Superman, and you fly really high over England, so you can see London in one direction, France in the other direction, and your underpants which are wearing over your trousers?

So the law just says that underpants can't be exposed, right? What is people just stop wearing underpants altogether to get around that?
*Shudders*

My pants have been known so sag now and again. Or a lot of the time. I wear belts. They still sag. Pants don't fit me right. and if I were in that town I would wear my pants like I always do. I'd like to see them actually be able to keep this. It's very against the law imo. How can you tell people how to dress? Isn't this the "land of the free"

*sigh* This is why I hate humanity. Yes, people flashing their underwear is annoying. No, it does not need to be fixed with legislation. Honestly, people need to grow up and realize that the world does not revolve around their personal comfort.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anaisa

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by licence

Quote:

---

[strike]Toplessness FTL!!!! So, if a man of 25 brushed past you an swiped all his chest sweat on you, you wouldn't mind because he's under 40?

---

[/strike]

Hmmm, I was thinking more of female toplessness.

---

I mentioned male toplessness, because in England it's illegal for women to walk around topless in public already, an that's where I live. [strike]That law in itself is stupid though, because if it's a matter of breasts being considered indecent, then that should mean flat chested women should be allowed to stroll around topless, and manboobed men should have to keep their tops on. An if women have to put up with wearing a top even if they'd prefer to take it off, men should have to do the same. An before anyone suggests we make it legal for women to all go topless too. A: Think of ugly women topless an you'll realise it's a bad idea an B: You're a sick pervert an I hate you.[/strike]

---

Please, you must move to Pittsburgh :jokey:

This may well be the first time I agree with Anaisa.

In Toronto men and women can now go topless. No wimminz does it any more (unless they are biker chix) but the idea is that you can do that.

Anyway I wear baggy pants but I have nothing to contribute because only the pants are baggy. I wear baggy pants that are 32 inches around the waist, not 50 inches.... O_o

So I can't empathize. So my contribution is to move to Toronto where you can go topless weeeeee~