snip snip

. . . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dyslexicon

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mirage

Right, that white stuff. I know what it is, and what it's for. It takes 5 seconds to wash it off in the shower, and you should be showering daily anyway.

So, what's the point of circumcision?

---

i told ya....because people are obsessed with fitting in

---

Fitting in? Circumcision is rare over here.

yep that's what i said i think, in this part of the world.

The US and Israel are the only two places where circumcision is widely practiced from what I know.

Is it really more than 50% in the US?

I would assume some African countries do it a lot too. Isn't Somalia notorious for female circumcision?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mirage

I would assume some African countries do it a lot too. Isn't Somalia notorious for female circumcision?

---

Different thing entirely. Apparently from what I have learned, female circumcision involves removal of sexual organs, instead of a mere clip and snip. Article. This one is used not for hygeine, but in order to prevent sexual arousal.

Notoriety I would guess to be something that borderline violates human rights.

I figured they'd do male circumcision as well when they already were on a roll!

I know the differences, and it violates human rights in my opinion, and a lot of other's opinions too.

I am, I kinda enjoy knowing my penis doesn't look like a giant earthworm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mirage

I figured they'd do male circumcision as well when they already were on a roll!

I know the differences, and it violates human rights in my opinion, and a lot of other's opinions too.

---

I don't feel as if my human rights are violated. I don't find it weird when guys are uncircumcized, either. It doesn't hurt or help anything either way, so I don't see why it's a big deal when people do or don't. Maybe if the parents where physically cutting off the dick it'd be a problem.

And female and male circumcisions are so different in the effects that they shouldn't be compared. To a male, it's almost completely for looks. For a female, though, it has serious ramification on their biology. Just because they're sometimes referred to as the same thing doesn't mean they're anything alike.

I was referring to female circumcision in my previous post, I guess I should have clarified that better. I think it's a silly thing to do to a boy anyway, seeing as it can never be reversed if it turns out he didn't like it.

No foreskin means less peen to feel with. I am glad I still have mine, and that my parents chose not to mutilate me without my consent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goldenboko

In other news reading this thread has disturbed me greatly.

---

Same here! I pretty sure I'm not. So just to make sure if you are circumcized you don't have foreskin? That's how you can tell the difference correct? Well I guess for the people who don't know what circumcision is just google it. I'm sure your bound to see many...interesting things there. :D

Thankfully I am not circumcised, as that would mean I'd have one less spot to hide my EoFF password.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chimp

No foreskin means less peen to feel with.

---

Not really, it just means the head is constantly exposed. I doubt sexual activity actually feels any different (it's fundamentally the exact same activity with or without the foreskin)

I am!