You know I support this 100% but I do want to know what the topic is implying:
"Okay to be gay in California" implies that California had anti, say, buggery laws in place that were struck down when same-sex marriage was legal? That's how I'm viewing the two statements (title and topic).
Or failing that, prior to same-sex marriages being legal in California was it also illegal to be gay in California? I was under the impression that places like San Francisco had high demographics of homosexuals.
I could go on, but I'm trying to figure out what the topic claim has anything to do with anything. Does it mean because it's explicitly legal suddenly it's okay? Because we all know that just because it's illegal doesn't mean it's wrong.
Yeah, nitpicking. Forget I said anything. Huzzah! *celebrates*