http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/78656320/648941
this is the ugliest avatar ever, EWW ORX GROSS
and i say no to 100x100 avatars, 80x80 is just right.
Printable View
http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/78656320/648941
this is the ugliest avatar ever, EWW ORX GROSS
and i say no to 100x100 avatars, 80x80 is just right.
One day soon, I will kill an admin and wear their skin. Through the physical memory I will have access to, I will be able to key in their password, and the fora shall experience 100x100 avatars.
No one likes to stand out with avatars .-.
This
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b7...zy_fat_kid.gif
It scares me...then makes me laugh
It's not "going down," it's returning to what once was, and what should never have been changed.
I think there may be another CK opening soon.
If it's 80x80 then it gives those who have detailed avatars the ability to use them, but doesn't limit those who have smaller ones.
Best bet would be to go with whatever the standard is. Personally, I'm cool with 80x80.
Is this really a pressing issue? As a would-be-but-not-very-likely-since-I-was-likely-voted-in-as-a-joke CK, I feel that we should visit the starving children of Africa and end their misery by showing them the ways of the Space God while denying them food but coming up with more than enough money to build churches in my, er, its name.
Then, I will drink the urine from wild bush women out of a chilled champagne glass while the children lick the grime off my scales and clean out my orifices and will be rewarded with blades of grass and tarantulas to feed upon.
60x60 and keeping it cool.
Ok fine I've changed my avatar. Happy now?