There are as many exceptions to the rule as there are examples :|
Printable View
There are as many exceptions to the rule as there are examples :|
Because they'll forget the second half of the phrase, which continues: "and when sounding like 'A' as in 'neighbor' and 'weigh'."
People are dumb, and languages changes. Whether you believe in strict adherence to grammar or you like texting and have pay-by-the-letter plan, it will happen.
I dislike the spelling of "its" to refer to the possesive. Everything else, eg: Harry's dog, the car's motor, uses apostrophe s, however "it's" only means it is, it doesnt refer to the posesion of "it". English is stupid and inconsistent.
and if "Web 2.0" can be a word then so can "alot"
I make up my own words sometimes, but I still feel you should use real words.
Language changes and evolves, but "alot" just looks smurfing ugly so I hope it stays the same.
Also, paging Goldenboko to this thread for his use of the word "then" instead of "than"!
Language is always changing. I'm laughing at the rage towards these "new" words like they're going to destroy a perfect language. Language isn't perfect and it never was. There's nothing to corrupt!
Take it like a man! NNGH
I'm curious what context you used that in, Zeldy. How can "do not" not make sense in any "don't" context @_@;;
I made up three words for an AP Language paper one time. There should be a word for "one who lacerates", imo.
My bfff Megan, however, once asked me how you spelled "woulnt".
She said this very clearly, so I was confused by what she meant.
"Do you mean won't?"
"nonono, woulnt. Not won't."
"ummmmmm. Can you use it in a sentence?"
"I woulnt do it."
"Yeah, that's won't."
"No! it can't be!"
"no, really, it is."
"OMG, you're right! I think the reason I was confused is because [ex-friend] always would say "I want it, I want it", and that would sound like "I won't it, I won't it.", so I thought "woulnt" is what "won't" should be."
Herassment.
Yes, I went there.