What defines 'real music'

Printable View

Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
  • 06-18-2010, 04:00 PM
    KentaRawr!
    Quote:

    Go on MySpace, Last.fm, Pandora, hypem.com, music blogs, your friend's last.fm, go somewhere and just listen to some stuff you've never heard. I mean, really search for hours until you find something that speaks to you, and when you do you'll know what they meant by "music". I really think they meant music in the sense that you know it by something other than movies, shows, or videogames.
    I've done this quite a bit, actually, but in the form of youtube browsing. I found out about Richard Galliano this way. :p Also, I even listen to music from video games I've never played, so it's not that I really like the video games, I just find myself enjoying their soundtracks.
  • 06-19-2010, 01:15 AM
    Rad Bromance
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Shiny View Post
    The people who say real music is anything they like and what isn't is what they don't like are ignorant.

    Anyone who actually uses the term "REAL music" is silly. :)
  • 06-19-2010, 01:38 AM
    jenovajunkie
    You don't say.... music eh? YAY debate debate
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Yeargdribble View Post
    @Hythloday
    Beethoven is crap.

    My god...... YOU ARE CRAP!
    Music is defined by the listener not by anyone else. There is no term "real music". I hate to intrude but anyone and everyone has their own definition for music. Islamic people have what we (western cultures) would call music, but they do not. It's called " the call of prayer" and to them it's not a form of music. Before you go make judgements like "Beethoven is crap" and something isn't real music, think about think bout this: If it's not real music, why do people listen to it? Why do people make it? How are they enjoying it?

    Just because you think one way, doesn't mean that's the only way.
    Music is whatever you receive as music. Real music is what you perceive it as.

    (SPOILER)................ psychology is a science!
  • 06-19-2010, 05:42 AM
    The Man
    psst, Yeargdribble was being sarcastic about the bit you quoted to make a point.
  • 06-19-2010, 06:08 AM
    Mr. Graves
    As The Man (Aaron) said in a previous post, anything with a melody can be 'music'. Other than that, it comes down to a matter of opinion, really.

    I've really come to love anything metal (death, industrial, etc.) in the last few years. In my opinion, anything that doesn't come close to rocking hard is mellow, and nothing I would listen to regularly. Of course, people are as varied in tastes of music as they are varied in personalities. Each person should like what they like.

    Anyone who thinks someone else is inferior due to something like musical tastes is just shallow, and not worth hanging out with. Musical taste should be last thing that matters when it comes to who you hang out with, who you become friends with, etc. Seriously, what does it matter, anyway.
  • 06-20-2010, 04:49 AM
    nik0tine
    Quote:

    Plenty of famous composers don't use melody... from Bach to Philip Glass.
    Name one Bach piece that doesn't make use of melody. Hell, name one Bach piece whose primary focus isn't melody.
  • 06-20-2010, 04:30 PM
    jenovajunkie
    Oh my apologies for calling you crap then.
  • Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page
    Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123