Speaking of not having room, my PC only has 5.67GB of space left.
I'm thinking some things are gonna have to take a hike.
Printable View
Speaking of not having room, my PC only has 5.67GB of space left.
I'm thinking some things are gonna have to take a hike.
I could get a 1TB for $50 but then I'd be in the same position by the end of the year. It's only worth it to get more but I can't justify spending $100+ when I could just delete some things instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirage
What's so tough about deciding to buy a new HDD?Quote:
Originally Posted by BolivarPretty much. Within the first year, my 500GB hard drive was already filled with games.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyk
I'm gonna have to make some tough decisions this holiday :-/
Hence the tough decisions.
Playstation charges for PSN now whereas on PS3 it was apparently free. BALLS. Also I recently got a 120GB attachment for my 360 so it's unlikely I'll be getting a new gen anytime soon, but I plan on getting the PS4 when games that exclusive to it come out.
Yeah, about that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolivar
I really wanted to play those games until I played the first ten minutes or so of the first game. The battle system scared me off in record time. It just feels incredibly awkward. I was still going to continue to play through it because I thought "Eh I can put up with it long enough to get through the storyline probably"....until I read that the storyline is sixty hours long. Which is a shame because I hear the story is pretty great.
The sequels look like they changed the battle system to something more in line with what I like, but I have this damned mental hangup with playing sequels without playing the first game. Meh.
Not yet. I have the money saved for a PS4 for Type-0, but am not in any hurry since I'm playing the old FFs through. And I'm waiting for a decent deal.
The Witcher games are more like 30-40 hours long, more if you do a lot of side quests. Hang-ups aside, you really wouldn't have a problem jumping into 2 or even 3, as the stories are very much stand-alone - it's not overarching plots like Mass Effect or anything. Games like The Witcher 3 are the reason people buy GTX 980s in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMKAYeah, about that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolivar
I really wanted to play those games until I played the first ten minutes or so of the first game. The battle system scared me off in record time. It just feels incredibly awkward. I was still going to continue to play through it because I thought "Eh I can put up with it long enough to get through the storyline probably"....until I read that the storyline is sixty hours long. Which is a shame because I hear the story is pretty great.
The sequels look like they changed the battle system to something more in line with what I like, but I have this damned mental hangup with playing sequels without playing the first game. Meh.
The first game's combat is... unique but I look at it more like rhythm-based attacking and managing your spells in between strikes.. The heart of it is preparation - making sure you're using the right sword and combat stance, drinking appropriate potions applying the right blade coating beforehand. It puts you into the mindset of a professional monster hunter.
And the stories really are that good. Out of the modern WRPGs I've played that are plot and choice heavy, the Witcher games are far and away my favorites.
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by Egami
MGSV is when I'll shell out for a PS4, finances permitting. I haven't been this genuinely excited about an upcoming release for a long time.
If FFXV turns out to be a good game and not just a visual sploogefest, it'll likely end up on my to-buy list as well.
All going well, hopefully the PS4 will still be a 'current gen' console when the next Elder Scrolls or Far Cry title drops too.
Yeah, I'm gonna have to play them. I got The Witcher 3 free when I purchased my GTX 980 so I'm kind of obligated.Quote:
Originally Posted by BolivarThe Witcher games are more like 30-40 hours long, more if you do a lot of side quests. Hang-ups aside, you really wouldn't have a problem jumping into 2 or even 3, as the stories are very much stand-alone - it's not overarching plots like Mass Effect or anything. Games like The Witcher 3 are the reason people buy GTX 980s in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMKAYeah, about that...Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolivar
I really wanted to play those games until I played the first ten minutes or so of the first game. The battle system scared me off in record time. It just feels incredibly awkward. I was still going to continue to play through it because I thought "Eh I can put up with it long enough to get through the storyline probably"....until I read that the storyline is sixty hours long. Which is a shame because I hear the story is pretty great.
The sequels look like they changed the battle system to something more in line with what I like, but I have this damned mental hangup with playing sequels without playing the first game. Meh.
The first game's combat is... unique but I look at it more like rhythm-based attacking and managing your spells in between strikes.. The heart of it is preparation - making sure you're using the right sword and combat stance, drinking appropriate potions applying the right blade coating beforehand. It puts you into the mindset of a professional monster hunter.
And the stories really are that good. Out of the modern WRPGs I've played that are plot and choice heavy, the Witcher games are far and away my favorites.