I'm not sure how to interpret 'mostly female people'. Which parts of these people are female, exactly? :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo
Printable View
I'm not sure how to interpret 'mostly female people'. Which parts of these people are female, exactly? :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo
Jojo, revolutionary [strike]leader[/strike] member of the Fluffy Pink Party has openly criticized me, saying that I over-exaggerated her claims on cat smileys. She's not wrong, but in over-the-top slapstick journalism, it is expected.
~~~*** MORE HEADLINES ***~~~
Bob Outsources Coding Jobs to Highly Qualified Members of the Community!
Bob Adapts a Loony Children's Rhyme
Baloki - Staff Member - Acknowledges that Unne is EoFF's Mastermind, thus, Admitting that Unne is a Tyrant! Dubya to make statements later
Czech Confused By Fluffy Pink Platform, and 'Female People'
I can't tell you, why don't you come check? :-*
PS: I'm... not leader of FP party. xD Just a representative!
BAoTW has acctually been a part of many world-wide schemes to help better the Earth. We saved the endangered "Tasty Walrus" and cut Penguin P-p-p-pick up rates by 67%.
Also, in a bid for animal equality and humour, BAoTW have given jobs to millions of animals, for instance the penguin chauffeur in my sig. Also, recent studies indicate that BAoTW lowers your heart rate and increases your Mojo by an average of 32% in males and 88% in females.
BAoTW has also inserted funds into experimental sciences and has made asexual reproduction a posibility for humans, resulting in many lonely males having clones to spend their time with, which decreases suicide and stress rates.
Although BAoTW has had many world-wide successes we understand that our local community, EoFF, is extremely important and as such we're focusing alot of attention on you, the members. Studies conducted by the Polish Pathology Department in Sweden have shown that peopel who vote for us received a substantial increase in the happyness hormone Joyanarol. Be this through our complimentry drug gift baskets or through our steadfast efforts to entertain our wonderful EoFF community through our shows of spirit and unity is still unconfermed but is ultimatly unimportant.
I have been disheartened by your attitude BoB and have such written a complaint to the EoFF board of "Party Pooping Party Poopers" (P.P.P.P.)
Have a nice day people and remember. - Vote for BAoTW!Quote:
I am writing on behalf of myself and a few of my friends to state that Mr. Looney BoB's bald-faced lies and growing list of material falsehoods raise some new and very disturbing issues. To begin with, whenever BoB finds himself confronted by the law, he insists it needs reforming. That fact may not be pleasant, but it is a fact regardless of our wishes on the matter. If we are to build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the villainous and vexatious ideologies that BoB promotes. It is my contention that his standard operating procedure is to use both overt and covert deceptions to censor any incomplicitous announcements. But there's the rub; inane, twisted litterbugs serve as the priests in his cult of grungy teetotalism. These "priests" spend their days basking in BoB's reflected glory, pausing only when BoB instructs them to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility. What could be more libidinous? I mean, we can divide his pronouncements into three categories: violent, disgraceful, and stolid. I could accuse BoB of using cantankerous, deluded urban guerrillas to get his way, but I wouldn't stoop to that level. When I look back I think, "BoB should be locked up." If you've never seen him declare a national emergency, round up everyone who disagrees with him, and put them in concentration camps, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. It's my hunch that someone has to be willing to take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at him. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that people are pawns to be used and manipulated.
What BoB is incapable of seeing is that he says he's going to cause riots in the streets when you least expect it. Good old BoB. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how baleful they sound. To pick an obvious, but often overlooked, example, he keeps saying that his effusions provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, if he has spurred us to insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward Fabianism, then BoB may have accomplished a useful thing. He is the most prolix, useless, and officious waste of genetic material in our society. It's a pity. BoB wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that the only weapons BoB has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it.
I want to deal stiffly with subversive brutes who bowdlerize all unfavorable descriptions of his warnings. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because the objection may still be raised that immoralism is a noble goal. At first glance, this sounds almost believable. Yet the following must be borne in mind: If he is victorious in his quest to suborn disruptive porn stars to produce nothing but filth, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Please don't ask me to ignore compromise and focus solely on BoB's personal agenda. I simply can't do that. If an attempt to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills isn't repressive, it certainly is vicious.
Anyone who thinks that BoB's paroxysms won't be used for political retribution has never been hauled before a tribunal and accused of cronyism. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that when I'm through with BoB, he'll think twice before attempting to transmogrify society's petty gripes and irrational fears into "issues" to be catered to. Even if we accepted his catch-phrases, so what? Does that mean that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization"? Of course not.
Drugged-out frotteurism is the shadow cast on society by BoB's ideologies, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. Writing letters like this one has earned me more hate mail from BoB than you would care to hear about. He vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would, because if, five years ago, I had described a person like BoB to you and told you that in five years, he'd saddle the economy with crippling debt, you'd have thought me yellow-bellied. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how he is out to lay down diktats that force me to lose all self-control. And when we play his game, we become accomplices.
We must advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. Those who claim otherwise do so only to justify their own wishy-washy threats. Unsavory yahoos are more susceptible to BoB's brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle he puts them in. They then lose all recollection that I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Xenophobic blowhards like BoB, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in neurotic despots in order to convince them to use every conceivable form of diplomacy, deception, pressure, coercion, bribery, treason, and terror to limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion. Now let's have some fun and examine a few of his more ridiculous statements. First, BoB said that he understands the difference between civilization and savagery. That's rather hidebound, isn't it? Later on, he claimed that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. What this really means is that he wants to perpetuate myths that glorify boosterism.
As a practical matter, one does not have to preach hatred in order to supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into clericalism. It is a wicked person who believes otherwise. Imagine people everywhere embracing his claim that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity. The idea defies the imagination. BoB thinks it would be a great idea to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. By allowing him to flout all of society's rules, we are allowing him to play puppet master. I pause to note that BoB constantly insists that it is his moral imperative to instill a subconscious feeling of guilt in those of us who disagree with his offhand remarks. But he contradicts himself when he says that radicalism and absenteeism are identical concepts.
I alluded to this earlier, but life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is he so compelled to complain about situations over which he has no control? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that it's easy enough to hate him any day of the week on general principles. But now I'll tell you about some very specific things that he is up to, things that ought to make a real BoB-hater out of you. First off, he has stated that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy. That's just pure solecism. Well, in BoB's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that I want to give people more information about BoB, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I indubitably hope people draw: BoB's advocates all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. It's really amazing, isn't it? We can put people on the Moon and send robot explorers to Mars, but BoB wants to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom, then you should be working with me to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse. It is true that he can't, for the life of him, understand why anyone would prefer so much as one minute of solitude to the company of a clumsy gang of squalid, antisocial varmints, but it is our responsibility to ourselves, to our posterity, to our ancestors, and to the God of Nature, which made us what we are, to push the envelope on our knowledge of the world around us. (Actually, I have resisted taking legal action against BoB, as others have advised me to do, but that's not important now.) His perspective is that his stratagems won't be used for political retribution. My perspective, in contrast, is that BoB claims that he answers to no one. I maintain that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves, although I should add that BoB's machinations are as troubling as his insistence that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation.
As gloomy as BoB's subliminal psywar campaigns are, BoB doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. He has recently been going around claiming that insipid, pernicious devil-worshippers and loud brigands should rule this country. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.
It is easy for the public at large to dismiss sniffish, unconscionable protestors as wayward parasites. I have one itsy-bitsy problem with BoB's ploys. Videlicet, they drag men out of their beds in the dead of night and castrate them. And that's saying nothing about how he has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of his successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. BoB's toadies want to shout direct personal insults and invitations to exchange fisticuffs for one purpose and one purpose only: to destroy any resistance by channeling it into ineffective paths. What this underlines, I think, is that when I was younger, I wanted to oppose evil wherever it rears its meretricious head. I still want to do that, but now I realize that he has mastered the art of bamboozling unwary listeners by introducing names of persons and events of which they have only a hazy recollection and then making statements, seemingly documented, with such authoritative confidence that they never think of trying to clarify their own recollections or consulting a reference work. But that's not all: His sermons are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". I have now said everything there is to say. So, to summarize it all, I appear to have gotten ahead of myself here.
Relying on others, eh? SOUNDS LIKE COMMUNISM TO ME!Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Goals, eh? SOUNDS LIKE ORGANISM TO ME!Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Support for dictators, eh? SOUNDS LIKE ALGOREISM TO ME!Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
A communist, organistic Al Gore supporter is what you are! And the voters will realise it!
Nope, sounds like ORGASMS to me! The FP party endorses that, too. :love:Quote:
Originally Posted by Freakazoid
Do you also endorse insects?
Tempting, but imagine the scandal if a rival party were to find out! The Ace propaganda machine would have a field day. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Jojo
No, I do not endorse you. All insects please can go join Psy's party ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by InsectMan
*ahem* The Pink party is not afraid to stand up for the power of love and... feeling good. xD If you ever change your mind, Czechie...Quote:
Originally Posted by Czechy
After all the BAoTW flaming I've participated in over the past few days, I might actually change my mind and join the selfish bastards.
If you can't beat them, join them. *nod*
In recent news, Spritz, member of the community has written a long-winded, something no one will read in its entirety, complaint to the Board of Elections, the P.P.P.P. division, about Loony Bob and his platform, and his entire party.
Is this all just jargon, rhetoric, and slander, or is it the false-hoods of one fake party to another.
And what statistics is it that #eoff give us about their helping of animals... Does it help the voters by outsourcing jobs to the animals of the world rather than the clinically prisoned board members!? When did Penguins become recognized and begin immigrating from Antarctica. What does ANT have to say about it all. Why is Fluff Pink so suggestive. Why does BAotW have no defence against their killing of 10,000 walruses? Why is it that Bob is being backed into a corner by his opposition with little support from his party... WHO ARE THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEES!?
HEADLINES!
Insects, Tasty Treat in Some Areas - A Controversial Issue
Ace Party reduced to a mere Propoganda Machine by Czech
Insects NOT Endorsed as legitimate beings by Fluffy Pink - Rumors of Illegal Sweatshop Labor Stirs
Rainecloud has NO WILL POWER! Willing to Join BAotW because of Flaming and Fun! EoFF's personal Agenda's Misconstrued!
You're not selfish, and most certainly not a bastard, so I doubt you'd want to be associated with the likes of us. Sorry about being a jerk and all, and I hope you can get back into the election spirit, either with us or against us. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainecloud
Having said that, forcing my own head into a vice might prove to be a more amusing diversion than these elections.
Ah, to hell with this. I'm going to open a tin of rice pudding.
What are the parties stances on moral issues, since apparently Stateside, that's the top priority?
Take care all.
Hey, man. Al Gore invented the internet. How can you NOT support him when online? And let's face it, the choice was him... or Bush. =[Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychotic