Printable View
Im not overly concerned. His second account shouldnt have been banned because it was unnnecessary. Especially if he admitted to spamming and breaking the rules.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeza
I dont need to rules the decide wether thats fair or unfair. Ive got common sense. But I understand why you'd be expected to uphold the rules. Just didnt see it as necessary under the circumstances.
It was necessary because a banned member is a banned member regardless of what name he decides to use. If he was allowed to stay, every other banned member would want to have the same privilege.
It makes me sad how nearly every topic in feedback ends up being about who should and should not be banned, and whether or not the rules are justified, yadda yadda.
:fpguilt: Saaaaad Panda.
He didnt deserve to be banned Leeza. He admitted to spamming ages ago and showed he had become just as good a member as me or you. Its unnecessary. I've seen things through your point of view. Give me a sign that you're returning the favour for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeza
Makes me sad as well, Azar.
Give it up, Destai. You don't know what he did.
Its unfair. If you cant see anything besides what the rules say theres a problem with your system. Because the rules say so is a terrible excuse and it doesnt make it right.
I like Triple T, and if I had it my way he wouldn't have been banned. The problem is, I don't have it my way and he's not coming back, no matter how much we argue. So could we please just drop the subject and use the feedback forum as it should be used, for rampant spamming and oldbie jokes?
I think you'll find as you go through life that rules are put into place because it has been proven that they are needed. Such is the case here.
I agree with you BM121, which is why this thread is now closed. We are not going to rehash the same story again any more today.