Wait, it it Houston or Dallas that we don't like? :p
Printable View
Wait, it it Houston or Dallas that we don't like? :p
Xenomorphs don’t like Dallas either…
And that’s my net contribution to this topic.
Pretty much, except I had Ruth Sender who wrote The Cage come to my school. People who can deny it even happened are just ignorant and sad.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
*adds to list of reasons to invade Iran* O look, now all we need is a severe financial deficit and we're viable for war.
We have this nazi organization in Norway also saying that Holocaust never happened, in fact they call it "Holocash", because they see it as a fraud from the jews' side to gain sympathy and money. www.vigrid.no but it's in Norwegian, so unless you're PiP, you probably won't understand it. :p
I'm always mentioned before I post in a thread :( and then I post right afterwards, I smell a conspiracy *looks at the first post* anotherone!
I don't see why he woundn't have. You need to understand the mind of Hitler. You need to read the quagmire that was Mein Kampf to understand what was going on in his warped mind. His fight was against the Jewish 'plague' and Communism. Anything else was added after the fact by pressure from other NSDAP Government officials, ie the Homosexuals & Gypsies. Indeed many of Hitler's first Lieutenants were homosexual & with his full knowledge (Ernst Röhme & Heinze for example) and they were only victimised through pressure from other officials.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
He didn't believe negro or arab peoples were 'aryan' but he didn't see them as a threat. He made, and kept, alliances with many non-aryan peoples, the magyars, slovaks, italians & Japanese. Hitler was a warped troubled man but his aims were not to destroy every race other than white. It was to destroy the Jewish influence in Europe & Communism.
We need to concentrate on facts & not presumptions. There is no evidence whatsoever that he wanted to erradicate islam. Indeed, there were negros living freely in Germany throughout the Nazi regime. They were not allowed to join the NSDAP but they were not rounded up like the Jews & other minorities. Infact I read not too long ago in the The Times an account from a African-German who lived there during the Regime & his only complaint was that he wasn't allowed to join the Hitlerjugend...surreal stuff.
My point is don't throw fire on an inferno. It's pointless. The world knows what an inherantly bad, murderous & corrupt regime the NSDAP-Germany was. We don't need to add fiction & presumptions to it. There's no need & it belies the true nature of what the regime stood for, why it happened & how we can stop it happening again.
Holocaust denial or not, the man is a bloodthirsty zealot and needs to be removed unless you want thousands of dead Israelis on your conscience.
How would it be on our conscience?
Is any of this stuff actually true? The Holocaust, a myth? No way.
Most Historians now argue that the Holocaust was a consequence of chance, being that they had so many Jews in camps. The war (WWII) had started and they had to get rid of them. Their are suggestions that mass immirgration was wanted to get them out of Europe (Which is what was stated all the time) Problem is, the war prevented this.
Heydrich formulated the Holocaust idea (with help from Himmler) and they presented Hitler it. All he did really was sign.
XD! What a racist link! O.o'Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Manus
Pfft, as if that doesn't happen already and as if somebody would give a damn. They ARE Jews, after all. :rolleyes2Quote:
unless you want thousands of dead Israelis on your conscience.
Dude. Seriously. I really thought there was no need to explain this. The Holocaust HAPPENED. It was very real, very terrible, and very recent. So recent that my own grandparents and my friends' grandparents remember it vividly. As if that's not enough, you've got that largest amount of evidence amassed on any genocide ever to back everything up. Does that help you reach a conclusion?Quote:
Is any of this stuff actually true? The Holocaust, a myth? No way.
Ok it was jewish land IN LIKE THE YEAR 100B.C. its like the italians claiming all of europe because of the roman empire, or the french claiming germany because of Napoleons france. These people were displaced there, its not like they were living there before the war.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
Personally from my view, California is the most sane state there is right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
Ok, before the crusades christian pilgrims often went to the holy land, after the crusades (which i remind you is the christians fault) then there was tension and you probably wouldnt want to go there. Now adays everything was fine until after WWII when Isreal was formed. personally i think it would work, only the radicals on BOTH sides would need a time out, Its a vicious cycle that could have been avoided with level headed thinking in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
There are only terrorist because of unjustice done to Palestine, I DO NOT CONDONE what these terrorist are doing but seriously once again if isreal was never formed, there would be no radical terrorist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
Personally id rather have another country with the bomb, (and im highly leftist.) the last thing i want is a country with out a useless weapon (when would any level headed or even radical person use an atomic weapon... NEVER) resentment and brooding over the inability to conduct its own affairs. Any ways the world would be alot more dangerous if there was only one super power with the bomb, even if it was the united states (probably more so as they have the delivery systems.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
The way i see it the US only wants to disallow Iran the bomb because it would make Iran that much more easy to invade. This is why north korea still hasnt been invaded (that and the global resentment felt after no WMD's were found after a war was started on that assumption alone.)