Yea, edczxcvbnm has a point. We dont want Jurassic Park to suffer like Dino Crisis with stupid everything.
Printable View
Yea, edczxcvbnm has a point. We dont want Jurassic Park to suffer like Dino Crisis with stupid everything.
Yarrr!Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxx Power
Uh.... wow.... that plotline sounds about as stupid as they come. Dinosaurs with guns would actually be more *plausible*. GO VELOCIRAPTORS! Diseases don't survive umpteen million years. They don't hop to unrelated species without constant exposure to that species. And it wouldn't even be ABLE to affect the genetically modified JP dinosaurs. Who have enough amphibian DNA to switch from female to male.
And they DID determine what was wrong with the sick dinosaur in the movie. Remember the part where she stuck her arm in the giant, steaming pile of dino crap? She found the berries which were poisonous. Went on a rant about how the people designing the park didn't care about anything but looks.
This is going to turn out like the Matrix sequals and the Star Wars prequals.... so awful that they actually make the *original* worse.
Close. While she did go on that rant about the berries, she acknowledged earlier that there was no berries in the droppings. However, cut from the movie is what I already explained. The berries were being swallowed with gizzard stones, thus why it wasn't in the dino-crap. As I already stated..Quote:
Originally Posted by udsuna
It's dumb as all hell, but it's not technically breaking continuity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Autumn Rain
Doesn't the disease negate the whole Dinosaur=big/scary thing? If this "DX" thing is so deadly, then surely the killer dinosaur thing is kinda ruined because I'd be more bothered by the whole extinction causing dinosaur disease a lot more than a hungry T-Rex.
This sounds kinda bad, but I'll probably go see it anyway.