Got that right! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxico
Printable View
Got that right! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxico
who said to stop being a fanboy/girl?
The reason people are such is because they like it more, and hence why they buy it. People wouldn't buy nintendo if they didn't like it, and people wouldn't buy sony unless they liked that, so that's what makes the fanboy/girl, liking it and choosing it.
I prefer Nintendo because games is what they do, unlike the other 2 who could drop their video game industry and not really hurt at all. Compared to what the rest of the company makes, it's really not that significant.
THE JACKEL
technical, as in better graphics? ...which is said to not always to be the sole ingredient to a game's success.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirage
i was simply pointing out games i really enjoyed on the PS2 (though they are well-known). i first bought the games, simply not knowing whether i'd like them or not.
ok, narrow it down for instance, Resident Evil 3: Nemesis (PSX):
graphics - ooh, i wasn't impressed, though it didn't bother me at all.
story - great plot, IMO. it's what kept me going on the game.
music - the music accompanies the tempo of the game = well done.
lasting appeal - definitely not a waste to play it again on my watch.
i haven't a thought of flushing money down the drain, just to have it on GameCube. simply, not a decision based all on graphics. i hope i made my point there :mad: .
In honesty? Sega.
I just got a DC because I realized how many awesome games are on it. I also need a new Saturn and a new Mega Drive, but I already have the games.
I would honestly have to put Microsoft second, too. I know it's totally uncools to <3 Gates, but the X-Box was better for me than the PS2 was, excepting that the PS2 could play all the awesome RPGs from the PS1 era.
And then Sony in third. Or first, on your poll. They easily beat Nintendo IMO, though I have to give huge credit to the N64 they've never done anything else I care much about. I don't own a single GC game.
sony
3 letters
P
S
3
Only two of those are letters :D.
Dont forget the Nomad ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF
They're both equally great if you ask me.
The one who NEEDS to get the heck outt'a here is Microsoft.
That is true. I never had one though, so I didn't think of it first. xDQuote:
Originally Posted by Dreddz
Why? The only weakness the X-Box has is RPGs. Every other genre has a good representation there, and it's the best of the 6th gen consoles. (Well, except strategy games, but consoles never have strategy games.)Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathKnight
Microsoft should stay in the buisness, but they have got to get rid of that ignorant approach, acting like there the best and all. Its not like they have had a successful console......
Microsoft lost $4 billion US on the X-Box, so they must be doing something wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF
:ty:Quote:
Originally Posted by roto13-ness
I like both of em equally.
Nintendo. The game industry owes so much to these folks that no matter how huge another company gets, Nintendo will always be looked back upon as one of gaming's big pioneers.
Sony runs a good business, but i can't help feeling a little bitter towards them. Since they split from Nintendo on the 'Playstation' project, it seems like they've been trying to stomp them into the ground. Recent examples: PS3 controller (they didn't plagiarise, but it was obviously inspired and put in at the last minute); the PSP; buying out games that were intended to be Gamecube Exclusive (ResEvil4, Tales of Symphonia, Viewtiful Joe...). So, they run a good business, but some of their success is at the expense of Nintendo.
Nintendo were the ones who cut the deal, they wasted Sony's time and money, Im sorta glad Sony gave them the finger and made there own console....