http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...lgodchucks.jpg
...of course.
Printable View
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...lgodchucks.jpg
...of course.
Bruce Lee was extremely strong for his size.
And he was in better shape than Tyson.
And he was also a boxer.
And he could kick.
And he was faster.
And he dedicated every single second of his days to conditioning himself.
etc, etc, etc.
Bruce Lee would be screwed.
Iron Mike Tyson is the baddest man on the planet, and would prove it very easily against Bruce Lee.
Not to mention Bruce Lee would have his ears bitten off!
I'm wondering who suddenly lost all reasoning and voted for Mike Tyson.
That makes absolutely no sense, particularily when Lee's movements were so fast that the human eye and camera couldn't keep up with them, not to mention the fact that a quick side kick can deliver around 1500 lbs of force.
A punch can kill a man, but a kick with Lee's speed creates oblivion.
You'd be amazed at how much power smaller guys like Bruce Lee can generate with their kicks and punches. Make no mistake that someone who trained in martial arts as Bruce did could easily put enough power into their shots to make a guy like Tyson feel it pretty quick. Regardless of how well Tyson can take a punch or a kick, it all adds up, especially since Bruce would be hitting him fast and hard.
Bruce Lee, no contest.
is tyson wearing gloves?
Why Mike Tyson that psycho, against Bruce LEE1? Of course he would lose if you could've said a better boxer like Muhhamud Ali and still he would lose anyway too, but he's better than Mike Tyson.
http://bruce-lee.gungfu.com/mainpic1.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Good Thread taken out of context and cleverly put here to say it's obvious