Originally Posted by Dingo Jellybean
I think both Cena and Batista suck.
John Cena "acting black" is really lame. I switch channels when I see him on the mic because he sucks with it. Batista isn't that bad of a wrestler, but he's a crappy in-ring talent as well as being worthless on the mic.
The only reason he's WHC is because he has that "look" of a WHC. The WWE usually likes someone who is 6'4" or so with a buff body...regardless of how crappy their in-ring skills are(see The Rock). But at least The Rock was/is/will be great on the mic. Austin and Bret Hart, as well as Angle and a few others, have always had these 2 good qualities...being both good in ring and on the mic.
I was hoping to see Brock Lesnar vs. Batista match, but that won't happen anytime soon...but you can't trust WWE.com for news anyways.
But does anyone notice how "weak" Batista is for his size? I mean the guy is 6'4" and 317 lbs. (according to WWE, though I think he's more along the lines of 270 lbs). He botched realitively simple moves like the sit-down Powerbomb(Batista Bomb) on Kane and Orlando Jordan. Although Kane and OJ were fine, he didn't reach that sit-down position fully. But I guess it's because of his age (he's like, 39).
I mean when you look at Batista, that guy is as ripped as anybody (well, maybe not as much as Chris Masters) but he's really not that strong. I think that's why they switched TBS to Raw, because the WWE probably didn't want any chance of Batista feuding with TBS (or Viscera) because he'll probably break their necks botching the sit-down powerbomb.