I'll dumb it down for you for things in the future..
If i was talking about you, i wouldve used either your name or a quote.
glad this misunerstanding is solved.
Printable View
I'll dumb it down for you for things in the future..
If i was talking about you, i wouldve used either your name or a quote.
glad this misunerstanding is solved.
I don't care if you were talking about me or not. You basically said that those whom support a presidential candidate are blindly following them, and are fools. Look at your post, and look at where it is, and tell me if you can tell how it's insulting.
Here that peoples? If AK says something you think is stupid and you reply to it, it's because he's right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight
I did not speak about anyone in particular(as i dont know what you are talking about).. but as they say, retorting is sign of a guilty concience.Quote:
Originally Posted by KentarouShowing agreement is not blind following.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight
Good to know.
Ron Paul might be standing as a Libretarian though! So as a third party candidate he can ROCK THE VOTE and be completed overshadowed by John McCain winning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Manus
If I had a vote, I'd probably give it to Clinton. I'm not a fan of Obama because I'm not really convinced that he has much substance behind his inspiring persona. He strikes me as somewhat like David Cameron in that he's very good at inspiring hope in people, but I'm unsure whether or not he can actually deliver. I like the fact that he - personally - is trying to run a clean campaign even if those around him (e.g. Samantha Powers) aren't being the most tactful. I don't like how Clinton's run her campaign, but I don't mind her on the whole. Not really a supporter, but she's the best on offer. I don't think Clinton or Obama would beat McCain in all honesty.
Well, his mother was American.Quote:
Originally Posted by TavrobelYeah, because everyone who wanted to be a leader was less qualified than their peers. And that is to say that people who did not want to be in power were automatically more apt when thrust forth? I'll remember to tell Taft that, because he would ohh so definitely agree with you. Ohh, hi, Teddy. Hi, FDR. Hi, Churchill*. Make sure you say hello to Jackson and Grant while they are burning in hell.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight
Don't you just love sweeping overgeneralizations? I sure do!
Yeah I know he's British. He's also your mother and therefore, awesome.
Also, I agree with Miriel's post. It'd be nice if people took more balanced views on the candidate and it does annoy me when people discount a certain party or candidate without giving any rational reasoning behind the assertion. While I would prefer Clinton, I do see that Obama has a lot of strengths and think he's a generally nice chap, but I'm just not wholly convinced.
ROFLMAO!Quote:
Originally Posted by Nominus Experse
Epic win! :p
Obama all the way!
And again, you misunderstand the point(but seeing your record, thats not a big suprise)..Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13Here that peoples? If AK says something you think is stupid and you reply to it, it's because he's right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's KnightI did not speak about anyone in particular(as i dont know what you are talking about).. but as they say, retorting is sign of a guilty concience.Quote:
Originally Posted by KentarouShowing agreement is not blind following.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight
Good to know.
I say something general, Kentarou takes it personal, i have no idea what he is talking about, and all we are arguing about is whether or not i was talking to him.. as i am myself, i should know whether or not i am talking about someone..
but as you obviously know what i mean better then myself, enlighten us Roto about your deduction that im right if someone thinks what i say is stupid..
because what i actually said wasnt even the point.. but as usual, the point matters little to you doesnt it? As long as you get to bash me.
If someone follows another without actually knowing and agreeing what they stand for(that is what blindly means imo), then yes, they would be fools. But it was you who took that personally, i still have no idea why.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentarou
I want to vote for Obama's pastor; he's hilarious.
http://www.JEREMYTIME/mondatime/kaocinnamoroll.gif
I approve of this statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall banana
You accused Kentarou of being guilty of whatever it is you're bitching about because he actually responded to you. Sounds like I got it right the first time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's KnightAnd again, you misunderstand the point(but seeing your record, thats not a big suprise)..Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13Here that peoples? If AK says something you think is stupid and you reply to it, it's because he's right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's KnightI did not speak about anyone in particular(as i dont know what you are talking about).. but as they say, retorting is sign of a guilty concience.Quote:
Originally Posted by KentarouShowing agreement is not blind following.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerith's Knight
Good to know.
I say something general, Kentarou takes it personal, i have no idea what he is talking about, and all we are arguing about is whether or not i was talking to him.. as i am myself, i should know whether or not i am talking about someone..
but as you obviously know what i mean better then myself, enlighten us Roto about your deduction that im right if someone thinks what i say is stupid..
because what i actually said wasnt even the point.. but as usual, the point matters little to you doesnt it? As long as you get to bash me.
AK, I've described to you quite clearly what I found insulting. You showed no specification as to whom you were speaking to, and thus, I looked at your post as an ignorant and unwarranted statement against showing support for a presidential candidate.
Thats a given.Quote:
Originally Posted by TavrobelI approve of this statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall banana
Either him or Barillary Clibama.
What a bunch of morons you are.. I accuse no one, I talk to no one, make one general speculation..
so if you dont agree with that, or take it personal..
I dont give a :skull::skull::skull::skull:, it says more about you then me..
If you have a problem with it, go beg mullet, foa or leeza to delete it, if they are willing to do that on unfounded speculation.
Oh I'm sure they're willing to delete it. They might not appreciate you calling people "morons" though.
Holy crap, can we have one semi-serious thread outside of EoEO that doesn't turn into a pseudo-flame-fest?
I know people are purposely pushing buttons while still staying within the rules and it's getting tiring. Seriously folks, knock it off.
Anyone but Obama. Preferably McCain. Why? I want to see the population of the internet whine and cry like they did when Bush won. Their reactions if their precious little Obama lost would be priceless.
Of course, he won't, but y'know. They're all the same anyway.