It suits me perfectly!
It's repereanting the 2 things that are very important to me.
Printable View
It suits me perfectly!
It's repereanting the 2 things that are very important to me.
Either way , he's going to emerge from that case and find himself financially ruined.
NOT EVEN :mad2: micheal jackson would NEVER molest anyone :mad2: those people are just gold diggers and are after his money. there's a show that reanacts (sorry for my spelling) the real trial. And by the looks at it the actors that are subposed to be the victims are straight up LYING !!!
The underlying problem is that even if MJ did not abuse any of these kids, he was still having slumber parties and the like with them, which in my opinion is not something a middle aged man should be doing in any event.
Take care all.
Anyways the accusers are falling apart on the stand right now. Unless the state has some mad evidence against MJ they will lose big time. Right now it just seems like they are a bunch of liars and we have not even gotten to all the celeberties that MJ has for his defense from other who have tried to be swindeled by these people.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Captain
So, you think he should have slumber parties with kids? There's now a double negative.
Take care all.
I re-read your quote so many times and I still get confused when reading it ;_;
I am probably missing some word in the sentence that means what you want it to and it is just not clicking in my head. It is just going to be one of those things I will forever be going "I don't get it." *has accepted his fate*
he was still having slumber parties and the like with them, which in my opinion is not something a middle aged man should NOT be doing in any event.
Take out the NOT and it makes sense. You're saying that a middle aged man should be having slumber parties and the like with the children. You're missing the first not in the sentence. :)
Thanks for clearing that up Leeza!
It's no real problem anyway Ed. I think, we both agree with each other, but we just got very confused.
Take care all.
In other awesome court news Scott Peterson gets the "Death" Penalty. I say "Death" because CA only executes one a year. This makes it so that he may never be executed. He will most likely die before that day ever comes.
Also it seems as though Robert Blake has been acquitted of all murder and one count of solicitation. Last I read they are deadlocked on the second solicitation charge.
Why didn't E! have a reenactment of those cases?
Take care all.
Because no one really cares about Blake anymore and same with Peterson?
Touche`! Though, Nick Nolte, drunk Nick Nolte that is, could have played Blake in my opinion.
Take care all.
James Brown was in prison for seven years on drug and dangerous driving offences.Bet he didn't " feel good " when he found himself behind bars ;)
IMHO there is NOTHING wrong with an adult having slumber parties with children (Although technically speaking it's not a slumberparty - as girls AND boys are there)